Routine gastric residual volume measurement and energy target achievement in the PICU: a comparison study
Lyvonne N Tume1, Anna Bickerdike2, Lynne Latten3
1Faculty of Health and Applied Sciences, University of West of England, Glenside Campus, Blackberry Hill, Stapleton, Bristol, BS16 1DD, UK. Lyvonne.Tume@UWE.ac.uk.
Insights
Routine gastric residual volume measurement in pediatric intensive care units did not significantly affect energy targets. Not measuring GRV also did not increase adverse events like vomiting or pneumonia, challenging current practices.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric Critical Care Medicine
- Clinical Nutrition
- Gastroenterology
Background:
- Critically ill children often have inadequate energy intake.
- Routine measurement of gastric residual volume (GRV) is a common practice in pediatric intensive care units (PICUs).
- The clinical utility and impact of routine GRV measurement on nutritional delivery and patient outcomes are increasingly debated.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the outcomes of critically ill children in two European PICUs with differing practices regarding routine gastric residual volume measurement.
- To assess the impact of routine GRV measurement versus no routine GRV measurement on energy target achievement.
- To evaluate the incidence of adverse events, including vomiting, necrotizing enterocolitis, and ventilator-acquired pneumonia, in relation to GRV measurement practices.
Main Methods:
- An observational pilot comparison study was conducted in two similar European PICUs.
- One unit routinely measured gastric residual volume (PICU-GRV), while the other did not (PICU-noGRV).
- Eighty-seven children were included: 42 in PICU-GRV and 45 in PICU-noGRV. Energy intake, vomiting, necrotizing enterocolitis, and ventilator-acquired pneumonia were assessed.
Main Results:
- No significant differences were observed in the percentage of energy targets achieved in the first four days of PICU admission between the two units.
- The unit not measuring GRV demonstrated more consistent delivery of energy targets and less under- and over-feeding.
- The incidence of vomiting was higher in the PICU-GRV group, while rates of necrotizing enterocolitis and ventilator-acquired pneumonia were not significantly different.
Conclusions:
- Routine measurement of gastric residual volume did not significantly impair energy target achievement in the initial four days of PICU stay.
- Discontinuing routine GRV measurement did not lead to an increase in vomiting, ventilator-acquired pneumonia, or necrotizing enterocolitis.
- These findings suggest that routine GRV measurement may not be necessary and could potentially lead to more variability in nutritional delivery.
Abstract:
Critically ill children frequently fail to achieve adequate energy intake, and some care practices, such as the measurement of gastric residual volume (GRV), may contribute to this problem. We compared outcomes in two similar European Paediatric Intensive Care Units (PICUs): one which routinely measures GRV (PICU-GRV) to one unit that does not (PICU-noGRV). An observational pilot comparison study was undertaken. Eighty-seven children were included in the study, 42 (PICU-GRV) and 45 (PICU-noGRV). There were no significant differences in the percentage of energy targets achieved in the first 4 days of PICU admission although PICU-noGRV showed more consistent delivery of median (and IQR) energy targets and less under and over feeding for PICU-GRV and PICU-noGRV: day 1 37 (14-72) vs 44 (0-100), day 2 97 (53-126) vs 100 (100-100), day 3 84 (45-112) vs 100 (100-100) and day 4 101 (63-124) vs 100 (100-100). The incidence of vomiting was higher in PICU-GRV. No necrotising enterocolitis was confirmed in either unit, and ventilator-acquired pneumonia rates were not significantly different (7.01 vs 12 5.31 per 1000 ventilator days; p = 0.70) between PICU-GRV and PICU-noGRV units.
Conclusions:
The practice of routine gastric residual measurement did not significantly impair energy targets in the first 4 days of PICU admission. However, not measuring GRV did not increase vomiting, ventilator-acquired pneumonia or necrotising enterocolitis, which is the main reason clinicians cite for measuring GRV. What is known: • The practice of routinely measuring gastric residual volume is widespread in critical care units • This practice is increasingly being questioned in critically ill patients, both as a practice that increases • The likelihood of delivering inadequate enteral nutrition amounts and as a tool to assess feeding tolerance What is new: • Not routinely measuring gastric residual volume did not increase adverse events of ventilator acquired pneumonia, necrotising enterocolitis or vomiting. • In the first 4 days of PICU stay, energy target achievement was not significantly different, but the rates of under and over feeding were higher in the routine GRV measurement unit.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Respiratory Volumes
Tidal Volume (TV) Tidal volume (TV) is the air inhaled or exhaled in a...
Gastric Emptying
Respiratory Volumes and Capacities
Enteral Nutrition II: Nasointestinal and Gastrostomy Feeding
Nasointestinal Feeding
Nasointestinal feeding involves placing a tube...


