Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 22, 2026

Evaluating the Effectiveness of Cancer Drug Sensitization In Vitro and In Vivo
Published on: February 6, 2015
Clinical Pharmacology Tools and Evaluations to Facilitate Comprehensive Dose Finding in Oncology: A Continuous
Julie M Bullock1, Tiffany Lin1, Sanela Bilic1
1D3 Medicine, a Certara USA Company, Parsippany, NJ, USA.
Abstract:
Targeted therapies are now considered an integral component in the treatment armamentarium for many malignancies, and the approach to developing these drugs needs to be refined from the previous cytotoxic paradigm of toxicity-guided dose finding and identification of maximum tolerated dose to a paradigm driven by target activity. Moving away from the toxicity-driven dose finding and justification model requires an integrated approach in order to adequately characterize the risk-benefit of a drug. This approach starts with understanding the importance of collecting samples for pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic assessments in all phases of clinical development to fully characterize the pharmacokinetics and identify covariates and then correlating exposure to key markers of safety and efficacy in pharmacometric analyses to perform a robust risk-benefit assessment and establish the right dose. In addition, for oral agents, decisions on administering the drug with respect to food can impact dose among other clinical trial outcomes such as tolerability and patient compliance. Understanding the importance of model-based drug development as a decision-making tool to support drug development through incorporation of all relevant data allows for a robust risk-benefit assessment at key decision points. Utilization of clinical pharmacology tools and assessments throughout development will provide the key components of a successful oncology development program.
Insights
Developing targeted cancer therapies requires shifting from toxicity-guided dosing to target activity. This involves integrated pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic assessments for robust risk-benefit analysis and optimal dose selection.
Area of Science:
- Oncology
- Clinical Pharmacology
- Drug Development
Background:
- Targeted therapies are crucial in cancer treatment.
- Traditional cytotoxic drug development relied on toxicity-guided dose finding (maximum tolerated dose).
- This paradigm needs refinement for targeted agents, focusing on target activity.
Purpose of the Study:
- To advocate for an integrated approach in targeted therapy development.
- To emphasize the shift from toxicity-driven to target activity-driven dose selection.
- To highlight the importance of pharmacometric analyses for risk-benefit assessment.
Main Methods:
- Collecting pharmacokinetic (PK) and pharmacodynamic (PD) samples throughout clinical development.
- Identifying PK covariates influencing drug exposure.
- Correlating exposure with safety and efficacy markers using pharmacometric analyses.
- Considering food effects for oral agents' administration and outcomes.
Main Results:
- An integrated approach is essential for characterizing drug risk-benefit.
- Pharmacometric modeling aids in robust risk-benefit assessment and dose establishment.
- PK/PD assessments are key to understanding drug activity and safety profiles.
Conclusions:
- Model-based drug development provides a robust decision-making tool.
- Clinical pharmacology assessments are vital for successful oncology drug development.
- Optimizing dose selection based on target activity and PK/PD data improves risk-benefit.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
Nonlinear Pharmacokinetics: Overview
Nonlinearity can arise due to the saturation of plasma protein-binding or...
Dosage Regimens: Partial Pharmacokinetic Parameters
Determination of Multiple Dosing Parameters: Loading and Maintenance Doses
Dosage Regimen: Individualization
Dose Response Curve: Conventional Versus Nonmonotonic

