Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 22, 2026

Measuring the Subjective Value of Risky and Ambiguous Options using Experimental Economics and Functional MRI Methods
Published on: September 19, 2012
Linguistic Multi-Attribute Group Decision Making with Risk Preferences and Its Use in Low-Carbon Tourism Destination
1School of Information, Zhejiang University of Finance and Economics, Hangzhou 310018, China. hhlin0731@163.com.
This study introduces a new framework for selecting low-carbon tourism destinations using multi-attribute group decision-making. It addresses challenges with linguistic terms and incomplete weights, offering a practical solution for sustainable tourism planning.
Area of Science:
- Environmental Science
- Tourism Management
- Operations Research
Background:
- Low-carbon tourism is crucial for emission reduction and environmental protection.
- Selecting sustainable destinations involves complex decisions with multiple criteria.
- Existing models often struggle with linguistic data and incomplete attribute weights.
Purpose of the Study:
- To develop a novel framework for multi-attribute group decision-making (MAGDM) in low-carbon tourism destination selection.
- To handle linguistic terms for attribute evaluations and incomplete attribute weight information.
- To provide a practical methodology for real-world sustainable tourism planning.
Main Methods:
- Established a nonlinear programming model to capture group risk preferences from individual linguistic terms.
- Converted linguistic decision matrices to triangular fuzzy decision matrices.
- Aggregated individual matrices into a group triangular fuzzy decision matrix.
- Developed a linear programming model to determine optimal attribute weights with incomplete information.
Main Results:
- Successfully devised a procedure for linguistic multi-attribute group decision-making.
- Demonstrated the framework's applicability through a low-carbon tourism destination selection case study.
- Provided a robust method for handling subjective evaluations and uncertain weights.
Conclusions:
- The developed framework effectively addresses complex decision-making in low-carbon tourism.
- The methodology offers a practical tool for selecting sustainable tourism destinations.
- This research contributes to advancing decision support systems in environmental management and tourism.
Related Concept Videos
Decision Making: P-value Method
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is proposed. The claim is based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to the claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses: a null hypothesis would be a neutral statement while the alternative hypothesis can...
Decision Making: Traditional Method
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is decided based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to this claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses, out of which a null hypothesis would be a...
Decision Making
Automatic decision-making is fast, intuitive, and relies on gut feelings...
The Anchoring-and-Adjustment Heuristic
Framing Effects
Frustration and Conflict: Avoidance-Avoidance, Double-Approach Avoidance
