External Ventricular Drains After Subarachnoid Hemorrhage: Is Less More?
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 22, 2026

Neuronavigation and Laparoscopy Guided Ventriculoperitoneal Shunt Insertion for the Treatment of Hydrocephalus
Published on: October 14, 2022
David Y Chung1, Stephan A Mayer2, Guy A Rordorf3
1Division of Neurocritical Care and Division of Stroke, Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 55 Fruit St, Boston, MA, 02114, USA. dychung@mgh.harvard.edu.
Abstract:
External ventricular drains (EVD) are essential in the early management of hydrocephalus and elevated intracranial pressure after subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH). Once in place, management of the EVD is thought to influence long-term patient outcomes, rates of ventriculitis, incidence of delayed cerebral ischemia, need for a ventriculoperitoneal shunt, and intensive care unit (ICU) and hospital length of stay. The available evidence supports adopting early clamp trials and intermittent cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) drainage. However, a recent survey demonstrated that most neurological ICUs employ the opposite approach of continuously open EVDs and gradual weaning. In this article, we review the literature and arguments for and against the different EVD approaches. We conclude that an early clamp trial and intermittent CSF drainage can be safe and result in fewer EVD complications and shorter length of stay. Given the discrepancy between the available evidence and current practice, more studies on the optimal management of EVDs are warranted with the greatest need for multicenter prospective studies.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Aneurysm IV: Nursing Management
Hemodialysis I: Introduction
Cardiomyopathy VII: Pre and Post Operative Nursing Management
Venous Thrombosis III: Interprofessional Care
Suctioning the Nasopharyngeal Airway
Equipment Required

