Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 22, 2026

Simulating Impacts of Ice Storms on Forest Ecosystems
Published on: June 30, 2020
Superstorm Sandy: Emergency management staff perceptions of impact and recommendations for future preparedness, New
Adam Yanson1, Asante Shipp Hilts1, Stephanie Mack2
1New York State Department of Health, Albany, New York; University at Albany School of Public Health, Rensselaer, New York.
Objective:
This study collected and summarized feedback from staff at the New York State (NYS) Office of Emergency Management (OEM) and three county OEMs within NYS to understand lessons learned from the 2012 Superstorm Sandy.
Design:
Cross-sectional qualitative and quantitative analysis.
Subjects, Participants:
One staff person from each identified critical role from the state and county OEMs who were still employed in the roles identified.
Interventions:
In-person interviews in 2014 followed by an anonymous survey in 2015 examined the response strengths, challenges, and recommendations using federally and study-defined Public Health Preparedness Capabilities. Quantitative analysis of staff survey ratings was used to summarize perceptions of interagency collaboration, communication effectiveness, and differences by staff position.
Results:
Response rates were 78 percent for interviews (n = 7) and 45 percent for surveys (n = 36). In interviews, "emergency operations coordination" was cited most frequently (48 percent), specifically for successful interagency coordination. "Emergency operations coordination" was also cited most among challenges (45 percent), with emphasis on problems with uniformity of software systems across agencies. Survey responses indicated that "volunteer management" (50 percent) and the "safety and health of responders" (40 percent) were frequently reported as challenges. Additionally, 38 percent of OEM staff reported that situation reports submitted by health departments need improvement. Recommendations from OEM staff included "emergency operations coordination" (36 percent) such as sharing of resources and "training" (16 percent) including hospital evacuation training.
Conclusions:
Analysis of OEM staff feedback identified specific challenges, and concrete recommendations were made to improve response going forward.
More Related Videos
12:22Mindfulness in Motion MIM: An Onsite Mindfulness Based Intervention MBI for Chronically High Stress Work Environments to Increase Resiliency and Work Engagement
Published on: July 1, 2015
13:00Modifying the Bank Erosion Hazard Index BEHI Protocol for Rapid Assessment of Streambank Erosion in Northeastern Ohio
Published on: February 13, 2015
Related Concept Videos
Applications of GIS: Disaster Management and Emergency Response
Acute Coronary Syndrome V: Nursing Management
SBAR II: Application of SBAR
SBAR Report from a Nurse to a Health Care Provider
S: "Hello, Dr. Smith. This is Jane, RN, from the Med Surg unit. I am calling to tell you about Ms. White in Room 210, who is experiencing increased pain and redness at her incision site. Her recent...
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation III: AED Use
Design Example: Analyzing Capacity Contours for Flood Risk Assessment
Bystander Effect