Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Vaccinations01:51

Vaccinations

52.2K
Overview
52.2K
Accountability and Responsibility of a Nurse I01:30

Accountability and Responsibility of a Nurse I

3.1K
Accountability in nursing is a fundamental principle that underscores the obligation of nurses to take responsibility for their actions and answer for any errors or omissions in patient care. This principle is grounded in the professional, legal, and ethical frameworks that shape nursing practice. For instance, nurses must adhere to all relevant laws, regulations, and practice standards, including guidelines set forth by nursing boards and professional bodies, to ensure their actions comply...
3.1K
Accountability and Responsibility of a Nurse II01:09

Accountability and Responsibility of a Nurse II

1.2K
Professional accountability in nursing is a multifaceted concept that encompasses professional ethics, legal standards, and employment expectations. This framework ensures that nurses maintain and elevate the quality of care while upholding the values of their profession. It compels them to treat patients, families, and colleagues with respect, compassion, and integrity.
For example, a nurse demonstrating respect and compassion might listen attentively to a patient's concerns, provide...
1.2K
Impact of Pharmacokinetic–Pharmacodynamic Models: Regulatory Decisions01:15

Impact of Pharmacokinetic–Pharmacodynamic Models: Regulatory Decisions

30
PK–PD modeling has significantly influenced FDA regulatory decisions, particularly drug approval, dosage optimization, and labeling. These models integrate pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics (PD) to predict drug behavior and effects, aiding in optimizing dosing regimens and enhancing the probability of clinical trial success.One notable example is Nesiritide (Natrecor®), a recombinant human brain natriuretic peptide for treating acute decompensated congestive heart failure...
30
Ethical Dilemmas I01:17

Ethical Dilemmas I

2.1K
Ethical dilemmas in nursing are of utmost importance, as they often arise from the tension between adhering to core ethical principles and the practical realities of healthcare delivery. These dilemmas require nurses to navigate complex situations where competing ethical considerations pull them in different directions.
Let us explore some examples to understand the potentially complex moral decisions nurses face.
Take the case of caring for minors, particularly in areas related to reproductive...
2.1K
Healthcare Associated Infections II: Preventive Measures01:22

Healthcare Associated Infections II: Preventive Measures

4.4K
Essential infection prevention measures are based on the knowledge of the infection chain, the modes of transmission in healthcare settings, and the use of the best practices in all healthcare settings. Compulsory public reporting of healthcare-associated infection rates is needed to allow individuals and the community to make informed choices regarding selecting a healthcare facility.
The best practices for preventing healthcare-associated infections include hand hygiene, patient risk...
4.4K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Broadly protective mucosal vaccination in the respiratory tract.

Nature immunology·2026
Same author

Toward Patient-Centric Digital Monitoring of Obstructive Sleep Apnea: Mixed Methods Study.

Journal of medical Internet research·2026
Same author

Antigen-agnostic identification of poxvirus broadly neutralizing antibodies targeting OPG153.

Science translational medicine·2025
Same author

Monoclonal antibodies protect against pandrug-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae.

Nature·2025
Same author

Microbes without borders: uniting societies for climate action.

mBio·2025
Same author

Microbes without borders: uniting societies for climate action.

FEMS microbiology ecology·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Feb 22, 2026

Fabrication of Pulsatile Polymeric Microparticles Encapsulating Rabies Antigen
07:44

Fabrication of Pulsatile Polymeric Microparticles Encapsulating Rabies Antigen

Published on: May 12, 2023

1.6K

Improving accountability in vaccine decision-making.

James Kenneth Timmis1, Steven Black2, Rino Rappuoli3

  • 1a Student MSc Health Policy, St Mary's Campus , Imperial College London , London , UK.

Expert Review of Vaccines
|September 21, 2017
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Standardizing health decision-making procedures with stakeholder input enhances transparency and accountability. This approach ensures broader benefit consideration for new health measures, improving outcomes and reducing inequity.

Keywords:
Health Technology Assessment (HTA)MCDASMART vaccinesVaccine evaluationaccountability for reasonablenessaccountable decision-makingcore valuespublic health policytransparencyvaccine policy

More Related Videos

Rapid In Vivo Assessment of Adjuvant's Cytotoxic T Lymphocytes Generation Capabilities for Vaccine Development
09:03

Rapid In Vivo Assessment of Adjuvant's Cytotoxic T Lymphocytes Generation Capabilities for Vaccine Development

Published on: June 19, 2018

9.3K
Evaluation of Host-Pathogen Responses and Vaccine Efficacy in Mice
08:52

Evaluation of Host-Pathogen Responses and Vaccine Efficacy in Mice

Published on: February 22, 2019

11.3K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Feb 22, 2026

Fabrication of Pulsatile Polymeric Microparticles Encapsulating Rabies Antigen
07:44

Fabrication of Pulsatile Polymeric Microparticles Encapsulating Rabies Antigen

Published on: May 12, 2023

1.6K
Rapid In Vivo Assessment of Adjuvant's Cytotoxic T Lymphocytes Generation Capabilities for Vaccine Development
09:03

Rapid In Vivo Assessment of Adjuvant's Cytotoxic T Lymphocytes Generation Capabilities for Vaccine Development

Published on: June 19, 2018

9.3K
Evaluation of Host-Pathogen Responses and Vaccine Efficacy in Mice
08:52

Evaluation of Host-Pathogen Responses and Vaccine Efficacy in Mice

Published on: February 22, 2019

11.3K

Area of Science:

  • Public Health Decision-Making
  • Health Technology Assessment
  • Vaccine Policy

Background:

  • Current healthcare decision-making processes, especially for population-level interventions like vaccines, often lack transparency and standardization.
  • Decision criteria and priorities can vary significantly across bodies, potentially overlooking broader benefits and stakeholder perspectives.
  • This variability can lead to suboptimal health decisions, increased societal costs, and health inequities.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To propose and review a baseline set of core evaluation criteria for vaccine decision-making, emphasizing stakeholder input.
  • To assess the utility of stakeholder-centered criteria in enhancing transparency and accountability in decision-making procedures.
  • To demonstrate the benefits of integrating these criteria into Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA) tools, such as SMART Vaccines.

Main Methods:

  • Development of a core set of evaluation criteria, primarily derived from the vaccine research community.
  • Review of the impact and utility of stakeholder-centered considerations in decision-making frameworks.
  • Application and exemplification using Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA) tools, specifically SMART Vaccines.

Main Results:

  • Stakeholder-centered criteria can significantly increase the transparency and accountability of health decision-making procedures.
  • The inclusion of these criteria supports international capacity building and improves health outcomes.
  • Standardized decision procedures incorporating stakeholder perspectives reduce societal costs and health inequities.

Conclusions:

  • Standardization of decision procedures across equivalent national bodies is crucial for effective and comparable health outcomes.
  • Integrating stakeholder-centered criteria is essential for transparent, accountable, and equitable health decision-making.
  • This approach fosters better health, reduces costs, and mitigates inequities arising from suboptimal decision processes.