Morphometric Analysis of the Middle Clinoid Process Using Maxillofacial Computed Tomography Scans
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 22, 2026

Analysis of Craniomaxillofacial Malformations in Mice Using Three-dimensional Microcomputed Tomography
Published on: January 17, 2025
Christopher Miller1, Roukoz Chamoun1, David Beahm2
1Department of Neurosurgery, The Uni-versity of Kansas School of Medicine, Kansas City, Kansas.
Background:
The interest in detailed anatomy of the sella and parasellar regions has resurged recently due to the wide clinical applications of the expanded endoscopic approaches to the skull base. The middle clinoid process (MCP) is a bony structure that can affect wide endoscopic exposure of the sella and parasellar region.
Objective:
To study and analyze the anatomic variations of the MCP in the general population using computed tomography scans.
Methods:
A total of 150 maxillofacial computed tomography scans were reviewed to characterize the MCP. Only adult patients without intracranial or nasal pathology were included. Measurements were made in the axial and sagittal planes to determine the maximum diameter, length, angulation, and location of the MCP.
Results:
The prevalence of the MCP was 30.7% in male and 42.7% in female patients. Of the MCPs, 41.8% were ring forming, whereas 76.4% were pneumatized. Quantitatively, the average axial base diameter was 4.6 ± 1.4 mm, the average sagittal base diameter was 5.0 ± 1.8 mm, the average length was 4.7 ± 1.7 mm, the average midline distance was 5.9 ± 2.3 mm, the average distance from the sellar-clival junction was 10.6 ± 3.3 mm, the average sagittal angle was 91.0 ± 21.1°, and the average axial angle was 45.2 ± 15.5°. A significant increase was found in the prevalence of MCPs in white patients compared with black patients, and a significantly greater midline distance and axial angle were found in male compared with female patients.
Conclusion:
A clear understanding of the sellar and parasellar anatomy is crucial for successful and safe expanded endoscopic approaches. This study provides a quantitative anatomic characterization of the MCP in the U.S. population with demographic data analysis.
More Related Videos
08:03Midface Hypoplasia and Cranial Base Morphology in Syndromic Craniosynostosis: A Comparative Analysis Study Using a Predictive Regression Model
Published on: November 4, 2025
10:23Author Spotlight: Three-Dimensional Cephalometric Landmark Annotation Demonstration on Human Cone Beam Computed Tomography Scans
Published on: September 8, 2023
Related Concept Videos
Imaging Studies III: Computed Tomography
Cranial Bones: Lateral View
The temporal bone forms the lower lateral side of the skull. The temporal bone is subdivided into several regions. The flattened upper portion is the squamous portion of the temporal bone. Below this area and projecting anteriorly is the zygomatic process of the temporal bone, which forms the posterior portion of the zygomatic arch. Posteriorly is the mastoid portion of the temporal bone. Projecting...
Imaging Studies I: CT and MRI
Description of the Procedures
Computed Tomography (CT) scan:
Computed Tomography (CT) scans use X-ray technology to generate detailed images of bones, organs, and tissues. During the scan, the patient lies on a moving table...
Cranial Bones: Superior and Posterior View
The frontal bone is the single bone that forms the forehead. At its anterior midline, between the eyebrows, there is a slight depression called the glabella. The frontal bone also forms the supraorbital margin of the orbit. Near the middle of this margin is the supraorbital foramen, the opening that provides passage for a sensory nerve to the forehead. The frontal bone is thickened just above each supraorbital margin,...