Related Experiment Videos
Comparison of immediate effects between two medical stretching techniques on Hamstrings flexibility
Thanda Aye1,2, Tsugumi Kuramoto-Ahuja1,3, Heonsoo Han1,3
1Department of Physical Therapy, Graduate School of Health and Welfare Sciences, International University of Health and Welfare: 2600-1 Kitakanemaru, Ohtawara, Tochigi 324-8501, Japan.
Journal of Physical Therapy Science
|September 22, 2017
Summary
New medical stretching (NMS) and conventional medical stretching (CMS) both improved hamstring flexibility. NMS demonstrated superior effectiveness in enhancing flexibility compared to CMS immediately after intervention.
Area of Science:
- Sports Medicine
- Physical Therapy
- Biomechanics
Background:
- Hamstring flexibility is crucial for athletic performance and injury prevention.
- Conventional medical stretching (CMS) is a widely used method for improving flexibility.
- Newer stretching techniques may offer enhanced benefits.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the immediate effects of new medical stretching (NMS) and conventional medical stretching (CMS) on hamstring flexibility.
- To determine which stretching technique provides superior improvements in hamstring flexibility.
Main Methods:
- Thirteen healthy adult males with limited finger-to-floor distance were randomly assigned to NMS or CMS groups.
- Participants performed one session of their assigned technique (30-second holds, twice per side, 2 minutes total).
- Hamstring flexibility was measured using the digital standing trunk flexion meter before and after each intervention.
Main Results:
- Both NMS and CMS significantly improved hamstring flexibility immediately post-intervention.
- The interaction between treatment and time was significant, indicating different effects over time.
- While both were effective, NMS showed a statistically more significant improvement in flexibility.
Conclusions:
- Both NMS and CMS are effective for immediate improvements in hamstring flexibility.
- NMS appears to be a more effective technique for enhancing hamstring flexibility compared to CMS.