Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Imaging in traumatic mandibular fractures.

Adil Naeem1, Hugo Gemal2, Duncan Reed3

  • 1Emergency Medicine Registrar, Gosford Hospital, Gosford, NSW 2250, Australia.

Quantitative Imaging in Medicine and Surgery
|September 22, 2017
PubMed
Summary

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Imaging Response to Treatment in Rheumatology.

Radiologic clinics of North America·2024
Same author

Describing the Challenges of Prehospital Rapid Sequence Intubation by Macintosh Blade Video Laryngoscopy Recordings.

Prehospital and disaster medicine·2022
Same author

The Association of Laryngeal Position on Videolaryngoscopy and Time Taken to Intubate Using Spatial Point Pattern Analysis of Prospectively Collected Quality Assurance Data.

Anesthesia and analgesia·2022
Same author

Delayed massive haemopneumothorax with shock after 'Zumba'.

ANZ journal of surgery·2020
Same author

Spontaneous cervical epidural haematoma-diagnosis as unexpected finding by CT: case series.

Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery·2020
Same author

Potential difficulty of distinguishing densely compacted thrombi from small calcific emboli.

Journal of medical imaging and radiation oncology·2018

Mandibular fractures, often caused by motor vehicle accidents, require advanced imaging for accurate diagnosis and treatment planning. Computer tomography (CT) offers superior sensitivity and detail compared to X-rays for assessing these facial bone injuries.

Area of Science:

  • Trauma surgery
  • Oral and maxillofacial surgery
  • Medical imaging

Background:

  • Mandibular fractures are common in young males, with motor vehicle accidents now the leading cause.
  • Accurate classification of mandibular fractures is crucial for determining definitive treatment.
  • Traditional X-ray imaging has limitations in detailing fracture displacement and condylar regions.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the effectiveness of different imaging modalities for diagnosing mandibular fractures.
  • To highlight the advantages of computer tomography (CT) in assessing traumatic mandibular injuries.
  • To inform optimal imaging choices for effective treatment planning.

Main Methods:

  • Review of imaging modalities including X-ray, computer tomography (CT), ultrasound, and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).
Keywords:
3D reconstructionMandibular fractureX-ray vs. CTclassification of fracturestraumatrauma imaging

Related Experiment Videos

  • Emphasis on multidetector-row CT for high-resolution reconstructions and 3D imaging.
  • Comparison of sensitivity and detail provided by each modality.

    • Main Results:

    • Computer tomography (CT) demonstrates 100% sensitivity in detecting mandibular fractures.
    • Multidetector-row CT provides accurate coronal and sagittal reconstructions, improving spatial understanding.
    • Ultrasound is a viable alternative for unstable patients but offers less detail; MRI is primarily for soft tissue assessment.

    Conclusions:

    • Computer tomography (CT) is the preferred imaging modality for traumatic mandibular injuries due to its high sensitivity and detailed visualization.
    • Advanced CT techniques, including 3D reconstructions, enhance the understanding of fracture severity and spatial relationships.
    • Imaging modality selection directly influences operative planning and patient outcomes for mandibular fractures.