Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Confidence Intervals01:21

Confidence Intervals

10.9K
An unbiased point estimate is often insufficient to predict a population estimate, such as population mean or population proportion. In this scenario, a confidence interval is used. A confidence interval is an estimate similar to a  sample proportion. However, unlike the point estimate which is a single value, the confidence interval  contains a range of values. These values have lower and upper limits, known as confidence limits, and can be designated as L1 and L2, respectively.
A...
10.9K
Design Example: Analyzing Capacity Contours for Flood Risk Assessment01:17

Design Example: Analyzing Capacity Contours for Flood Risk Assessment

341
Flood risk assessment involves careful planning and analysis to ensure the safety of communities near water retention structures. Capacity contours are a vital tool in this process, as they illustrate the potential spread of water at specific levels in a given area. In the context of building a bund across a small valley, these contours play a critical role in evaluating the safety of nearby residential areas.In this example, the bund is intended to store stormwater in the valley. The engineers...
341
Uncertainty: Confidence Intervals00:54

Uncertainty: Confidence Intervals

11.8K
The confidence interval is the range of values around the mean that contains the true mean. It is expressed as a probability percentage. The interpretation of a 95% confidence interval, for instance, is that the statistician is 95% confident that the true mean falls within the interval. The upper and lower limits of this range are known as confidence limits. The confidence limits for the true mean are estimated from the sample's mean, the standard deviation, and the statistical factor...
11.8K
Confidence Coefficient01:24

Confidence Coefficient

10.7K
The confidence coefficient is also known as the confidence level or degree of confidence. It is the percent expression for the probability, 1-α, that the confidence interval contains the true population parameter assuming that the confidence interval is obtained after sufficient unbiased sampling; for example, if the CL = 90%, then in 90 out of 100 samples the interval estimate will enclose the true population parameter. Here α is the area under the curve, distributed equally under...
10.7K
Interpretation of Confidence Intervals01:19

Interpretation of Confidence Intervals

10.2K
A confidence interval is a better estimate of the population than a point estimate, as it uses a range of values from a sample instead of a single value.
Confidence intervals have confidence coefficients that are crucial for their interpretation. The most common confidence coefficients are 0.90, 0.95, and 0.99, which can be written as percentages–90%, 95%, and 99%, respectively.
Suppose a person calculates a confidence interval with a confidence coefficient of 0.95. In that case, they can...
10.2K
Confidence Interval for Estimating Population Mean01:25

Confidence Interval for Estimating Population Mean

9.0K
A point estimate of the population mean is obtained from a single sample. Such a point estimate does not represent a population well because it needs to account for variability in the population. Single point estimate can also be biased despite the sample being selected randomly. Thus, a point estimate is often unreliable. A confidence interval is needed to reduce this unreliability.
A confidence interval for the mean is a range of values that provides an estimate of the population mean. As the...
9.0K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Simultaneous confidence regions for image excursion sets: A validation study with applications in fMRI.

Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)·2026
Same author

Estimating fMRI timescale maps.

Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)·2026
Same author

Conditional and marginal SNP-heritability to leverage ancestral and environmental diversity.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same author

Estimating the fraction of variance of crystallized intelligence explained by cortical surface area in early adolescence.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same author

Quantifying uncertainty in drift diffusion models of decision making under temporal dependence and parameter variability.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same author

When can whole-genome SNP heritability be reliably estimated from summary statistics?

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Feb 22, 2026

Integrating Remote Sensing with Species Distribution Models; Mapping Tamarisk Invasions Using the Software for Assisted Habitat Modeling SAHM
12:26

Integrating Remote Sensing with Species Distribution Models; Mapping Tamarisk Invasions Using the Software for Assisted Habitat Modeling SAHM

Published on: October 11, 2016

13.9K

Assessing NARCCAP climate model effects using spatial confidence regions.

Joshua P French1, Seth McGinnis2, Armin Schwartzman3

  • 1Department of Mathematical and Statistical Sciences, University of Colorado Denver, Denver, CO 80204, USA.

Advances in Statistical Climatology, Meteorology and Oceanography
|September 23, 2017
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study compares North American Regional Climate Change Assessment Program (NARCCAP) climate models. It finds that pointwise inference is misleading, emphasizing the need for multiple comparison corrections in climate model analysis.

More Related Videos

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
05:37

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

Published on: September 16, 2022

2.7K
Use of Principal Components for Scaling Up Topographic Models to Map Soil Redistribution and Soil Organic Carbon
09:44

Use of Principal Components for Scaling Up Topographic Models to Map Soil Redistribution and Soil Organic Carbon

Published on: October 16, 2018

10.8K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Feb 22, 2026

Integrating Remote Sensing with Species Distribution Models; Mapping Tamarisk Invasions Using the Software for Assisted Habitat Modeling SAHM
12:26

Integrating Remote Sensing with Species Distribution Models; Mapping Tamarisk Invasions Using the Software for Assisted Habitat Modeling SAHM

Published on: October 11, 2016

13.9K
An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
05:37

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

Published on: September 16, 2022

2.7K
Use of Principal Components for Scaling Up Topographic Models to Map Soil Redistribution and Soil Organic Carbon
09:44

Use of Principal Components for Scaling Up Topographic Models to Map Soil Redistribution and Soil Organic Carbon

Published on: October 16, 2018

10.8K

Area of Science:

  • Climate Science
  • Statistical Modeling

Background:

  • Climate models are crucial for understanding future climate scenarios.
  • North American Regional Climate Change Assessment Program (NARCCAP) provides valuable climate projection data.
  • Assessing model interdependencies is key to reliable climate change predictions.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate similarities and differences in climate model effects within NARCCAP.
  • To analyze average temperature effects across global and regional climate model combinations.
  • To investigate potential interactions between global and regional climate model influences.

Main Methods:

  • Employed various classes of linear regression models for analysis.
  • Utilized both pointwise and simultaneous inference procedures.
  • Identified geographical regions with differing climate model effects.

Main Results:

  • Demonstrated significant differences in average temperature effects across model combinations.
  • Conclusively showed that pointwise inference can yield misleading results.
  • Highlighted the critical importance of accounting for multiple comparisons.

Conclusions:

  • Simultaneous inference is superior to pointwise inference for climate model comparison.
  • Proper statistical inference requires addressing multiple comparisons in climate modeling.
  • Findings underscore the need for rigorous statistical methods in climate change assessment.