Biomarker immunoprofile in salivary duct carcinomas: clinicopathological and prognostic implications with evaluation of the revised classification
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 22, 2026

Establishment of a Clinic-based Biorepository
Published on: May 29, 2017
Soichiro Takase1,2, Satoshi Kano3, Yuichiro Tada4
1Department of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Tokyo Medical University, Tokyo, Japan.
Abstract:
Salivary duct carcinoma (SDC) is an uncommon, aggressive malignant neoplasm histologically resembling high-grade mammary ductal carcinoma. SDC can arise de novo or ex pleomorphic adenoma. To clarify the correlation of biomarker immunoprofile with clinicopathological findings and clinical outcome of SDC, we conducted immunohistochemistry for EGFR, HER2, HER3, AR, CK5/6, p53, and Ki-67, along with HER2 fluorescence in situ hybridization in 151 SDCs. SDCs ex pleomorphic adenoma more commonly overexpressed EGFR, HER2, HER3, and Ki-67 than de novo SDCs (P = 0.015, < 0.001, 0.045, and 0.02, respectively). In multivariate analysis, AR- and CK5/6+ were associated with shorter progression-free survival (P = 0.027 and 0.004, respectively). Moreover, patients with p53-extreme negative/positive demonstrated poorer overall survival (P = 0.007). On assessing the revised classification by the combination of biomarker expression, the percentages of each subtype were as follows: 'apocrine A' (AR+/HER2-/Ki-67-low) (24%), 'apocrine B' (AR+/HER2-/Ki-67-high) (18%), 'apocrine HER2' (AR+/HER2+) (35%), 'HER2-enriched' (AR-/HER2+) (12%), and 'double negative' (AR-/HER2-) (11%). 'Double negative' was further subclassified into 'basal-like' (EGFR and/or CK5/6+) (7%) and 'unclassified' (3%). Consequently, patients with 'apocrine A' showed a better progression-free survival than those with any other subtypes. Our revised immunoprofiling classification was valuable for predicting the survival and might be useful in personalized therapy for patients with SDC.

