Systems Pharmacology Model of Gastrointestinal Damage Predicts Species Differences and Optimizes Clinical Dosing

Harish Shankaran1, Anna Cronin2, Jen Barnes2

  • 1Drug Safety and Metabolism, IMED Biotech Unit, AstraZeneca, Waltham, Massachusetts, USA.

Insights

This study presents a mathematical model predicting gastrointestinal (GI) adverse events (AEs) from preclinical data. The model accurately forecasts clinical AEs for oncology agents, optimizing dosing schedules.

Area of Science:

  • Pharmacology
  • Mathematical Biology
  • Oncology

Background:

  • Gastrointestinal (GI) adverse events (AEs) are common dose-limiting toxicities for oncology agents.
  • Optimizing chemotherapy dosing schedules is crucial for managing AEs and improving patient outcomes.
  • Predictive models can reduce the need for extensive clinical testing of dosing regimens.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop a translational mathematical model for predicting GI AEs from preclinical toxicity data.
  • To incorporate known GI tract biology into a predictive model.
  • To validate the model using preclinical and clinical data for irinotecan.

Main Methods:

  • Developed a mathematical model of GI tract cell dynamics (stem cells, daughter cells, enterocytes).
  • Parameterized the model using published data for humans and rats, and preclinical histopathology data.
  • Validated the model against preclinical irinotecan-induced pathology and clinical AE profiles.

Main Results:

  • The model accurately fitted preclinical irinotecan-induced pathology in rodents.
  • Predicted enterocyte loss in patients receiving weekly chemotherapy matched observed AE profiles.
  • The model predicted lower AEs for a less frequent (Q3W) dosing schedule compared to weekly administration.

Conclusions:

  • A translational mathematical model can predict clinical GI AEs from preclinical toxicity data.
  • The developed model aids in identifying optimal dosing schedules for oncology agents.
  • This approach can improve the efficiency of clinical testing for chemotherapy-induced AEs.

Related Concept Videos

Pharmacokinetic Models: Comparison and Selection Criterion01:26

Pharmacokinetic Models: Comparison and Selection Criterion

Physiological and compartmental models are valuable tools used in studying biological systems. These models rely on differential equations to maintain mass balance within the system, ensuring an accurate representation of the dynamic processes at play.
Physiological models take a detailed approach by considering specific molecular processes. They can predict drug distribution, metabolism, and elimination changes, providing a comprehensive understanding of how drugs interact with the body.
400
Impact of Pharmacokinetic–Pharmacodynamic Models: Regulatory Decisions01:15

Impact of Pharmacokinetic–Pharmacodynamic Models: Regulatory Decisions

PK–PD modeling has significantly influenced FDA regulatory decisions, particularly drug approval, dosage optimization, and labeling. These models integrate pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics (PD) to predict drug behavior and effects, aiding in optimizing dosing regimens and enhancing the probability of clinical trial success.One notable example is Nesiritide (Natrecor®), a recombinant human brain natriuretic peptide for treating acute decompensated congestive heart failure...
30
Pharmacokinetic Models: Overview01:20

Pharmacokinetic Models: Overview

Pharmacokinetic models utilize mathematical analysis to achieve a detailed quantitative understanding of a drug's life cycle within the body. They are instrumental in simulating a drug's pharmacokinetic parameters, predicting drug concentrations over time, optimizing dosage regimens, linking concentrations with pharmacologic activity, and estimating potential toxicity.
There are three primary types of models: empirical, compartment, and physiological. Empirical models, with minimal...
2.3K
Pharmacodynamic Models: Overview01:27

Pharmacodynamic Models: Overview

Pharmacodynamic (PD) responses describe the interaction between a drug and its biological target, culminating in a physiological effect. These responses can be classified into different types: continuous variables, such as blood glucose levels; categorical outcomes, like survival rates; and time-to-event metrics, such as disease progression. Understanding and modeling PD responses are critical for optimizing drug efficacy and safety.PD models describe the relationship between drug concentration...
22
Pharmacodynamic Models: Direct Effect Model and Indirect Response Model01:29

Pharmacodynamic Models: Direct Effect Model and Indirect Response Model

Pharmacodynamic models are essential tools in understanding the relationship between drug concentrations and their effects on biological systems. By characterizing the dynamics of drug action, these models guide dose selection, optimize therapeutic efficacy, and inform the development of new drugs. Two major classes of pharmacodynamic models include direct effect and indirect response models.Direct Effect ModelsDirect effect models describe the immediate relationship between drug concentration...
33
Dosage Regimens: Partial Pharmacokinetic Parameters01:01

Dosage Regimens: Partial Pharmacokinetic Parameters

It is not uncommon for complete drug pharmacokinetic profiles to remain elusive in pharmacokinetics. This necessitates certain educated assumptions by pharmacokineticists to determine appropriate dosage regimens without comprehensive pharmacokinetic data from animal or human studies. One prevalent assumption is setting the bioavailability factor, denoted as F, to 1 or 100%. This assumption caters to the scenario where a drug doesn't achieve full systemic absorption, resulting in the patient...
205