Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 22, 2026

Integrating Computerized Linguistic and Social Network Analyses to Capture Addiction Recovery Capital in an Online Community
Published on: May 31, 2019
Efficacy of a Peer-Led, Recovery-Oriented Shared Decision-Making System: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial
Sosei Yamaguchi1, Ayano Taneda1, Asami Matsunaga1
1Dr. Yamaguchi, Dr. Taneda, Ms. Matsunaga, Ms. Sasaki, Dr. Mizuno, and Dr. Ito are with the Department of Psychiatric Rehabilitation, National Center of Neurology and Psychiatry, National Institute of Mental Health, Kodaira, Tokyo. Ms. Sawada is with the Graduate School of Social Welfare, Japan College of Social Work, Kiyose, Tokyo. Dr. Sakata is with the Department of Psychiatry, National Center of Neurology and Psychiatry Hospital, Kodaira, Tokyo. Dr. Fukui is with the Department of Educational Psychology, Tokyo Gakugei University, Koganei, Tokyo. Ms. Hisanaga is with the Community Mental Health and Welfare Bonding Organization, Ichikawa, Chiba, Japan. Mr. Bernick is with the Student Accessibility Office, Nagasaki University, Nagasaki, Nagasaki, Japan.
This study found that a shared decision-making system improved patient-doctor relationships in mental health care but did not significantly impact clinical outcomes. The system enhanced communication and collaboration between patients and healthcare providers.
Area of Science:
- Mental Health Research
- Health Services Research
- Patient-Centered Care
Background:
- Shared decision-making (SDM) is crucial for patient-centered mental health care.
- Integrating peer support and decision aids can enhance SDM processes.
- Evaluating novel SDM systems is essential for improving patient outcomes.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the effects of a comprehensive SDM system on patients with mental illness.
- To assess the implementation of the CommonGround approach, peer support, and a computerized decision aid.
- To compare outcomes between an SDM intervention group and a usual care control group.
Main Methods:
- A pilot randomized controlled trial (RCT) with 56 outpatients in Japan.
- Six-month follow-up period to assess outcomes.
- Random allocation to either the SDM system (intervention) or treatment as usual (control).
Main Results:
- SDM components and processes were more frequent in the intervention group.
- Patients in the intervention group reported significantly better views of their doctor relationship.
- No significant effects were observed on most clinical and recovery-related outcomes.
Conclusions:
- The SDM system partially improved patient perceptions of communication and doctor relationships.
- The intervention did not yield significant improvements in broader patient-level outcomes.
- Further research may be needed to optimize SDM systems for comprehensive outcome improvement.
More Related Videos
08:05A Prediction Error-driven Retrieval Procedure for Destabilizing and Rewriting Maladaptive Reward Memories in Hazardous Drinkers
Published on: January 5, 2018
07:31Implementation of a Real-Time Psychosis Risk Detection and Alerting System Based on Electronic Health Records using CogStack
Published on: May 15, 2020
Related Concept Videos
Self-Help Support Groups
Accessibility and Cost-Effectiveness
One of the primary strengths of self-help...
Community Based Intervention
Foundations of Community Mental Health Programs
Central to the success of community-based interventions is the...