Comparative Effectiveness of Surgical Treatments for Pediatric Hydrocephalus

I-Wen Pan1, Dominic A Harris1, Thomas G Luerssen1

  • 1Division of Pediatric Neurosurgery, Texas Children's Hospital, Department of Neurosurgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas.

Neurosurgery
|September 26, 2017
PubMed

Insights

Endoscopic third ventriculostomy (ETV) and cerebrospinal fluid shunts are common pediatric hydrocephalus treatments. ETV showed higher failure rates than shunts, particularly in infants under one year old.

Area of Science:

  • Neurosurgery
  • Pediatric Surgery
  • Health Services Research

Background:

  • Pediatric hydrocephalus presents a significant healthcare challenge in the US.
  • Surgical interventions are the primary treatment modality for this condition.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the effectiveness of endoscopic third ventriculostomy (ETV) versus cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) shunt placement for pediatric hydrocephalus.
  • Utilize propensity score matching on a large administrative claims database for comparative analysis.

Main Methods:

  • Analysis of the MarketScan® database (2003-2011) including patients 19 years or younger.
  • Defined surgery failure as requiring subsequent surgical treatment for hydrocephalus.
  • Employed propensity score matching, Kaplan-Meier survival curves, log-rank tests, and Cox proportional-hazard models.

Main Results:

  • Of 3231 eligible cases, propensity score matching created 455 balanced pairs.
  • ETV demonstrated a higher likelihood of surgery failure compared to shunts (relative risk = 1.4, P = .011).
  • Infants under 1 year old experienced lower ETV success rates than shunts (P = .009), with no significant difference in older children.

Conclusions:

  • Overall, no significant difference in time to failure between ETV and shunt was observed.
  • A notable exception exists for infants under one year of age, where shunts appear more effective than ETV.
Abstract

Related Concept Videos