Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Discussion: Impact of Breast Cancer Surgery on Physical Well-Being of the Chest: A Longitudinal BREAST-Q Study.

Plastic and reconstructive surgery·2026
Same author

Analysis of Career Outcomes and Practice Patterns After Microsurgery Fellowship.

Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open·2026
Same author

The Impact of Time and Place on BREAST-Q REACT: A Multi-Institutional Examination.

Journal of surgical oncology·2026
Same author

Longitudinal Trends in wRVU and Reimbursement for Free Flap and Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction: A 13-Year Valuation Analysis.

Plastic and reconstructive surgery·2026
Same author

Modeling the Arc of Financial Well-Being in Breast Reconstruction: A Mixed-Methods Study.

Plastic and reconstructive surgery·2026
Same author

Two-Stage Prepectoral Breast Reconstruction with and without Acellular Dermal Matrix: A Cluster-Randomized Noninferiority Trial.

Plastic and reconstructive surgery·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Feb 22, 2026

Robot-assisted Total Mesorectal Excision and Lateral Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection for Locally Advanced Middle-low Rectal Cancer
12:45

Robot-assisted Total Mesorectal Excision and Lateral Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection for Locally Advanced Middle-low Rectal Cancer

Published on: February 12, 2022

6.7K

Reconstruction of Peripelvic Oncologic Defects.

Katie E Weichman1,2, Evan Matros1,2, Joseph J Disa1,2

  • 1New York and Bronx, N.Y.

Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery
|September 28, 2017
PubMed
Summary

Peripelvic reconstruction, often following cancer surgery, requires careful planning. Understanding defect location and patient factors is key to selecting the best surgical approach for optimal outcomes.

More Related Videos

An Orthotopic Endometrial Cancer Model with Retroperitoneal Lymphadenopathy Made From In Vivo Propagated and Cultured VX2 Cells
09:48

An Orthotopic Endometrial Cancer Model with Retroperitoneal Lymphadenopathy Made From In Vivo Propagated and Cultured VX2 Cells

Published on: September 12, 2019

8.7K
Retzius-Sparing Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy
12:10

Retzius-Sparing Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy

Published on: May 19, 2022

9.5K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Feb 22, 2026

Robot-assisted Total Mesorectal Excision and Lateral Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection for Locally Advanced Middle-low Rectal Cancer
12:45

Robot-assisted Total Mesorectal Excision and Lateral Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection for Locally Advanced Middle-low Rectal Cancer

Published on: February 12, 2022

6.7K
An Orthotopic Endometrial Cancer Model with Retroperitoneal Lymphadenopathy Made From In Vivo Propagated and Cultured VX2 Cells
09:48

An Orthotopic Endometrial Cancer Model with Retroperitoneal Lymphadenopathy Made From In Vivo Propagated and Cultured VX2 Cells

Published on: September 12, 2019

8.7K
Retzius-Sparing Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy
12:10

Retzius-Sparing Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy

Published on: May 19, 2022

9.5K

Area of Science:

  • Reconstructive surgery
  • Surgical oncology
  • Anatomy

Background:

  • Peripelvic reconstruction is frequently necessary after oncologic ablative surgery.
  • The peripelvic region encompasses critical structures like the vagina, vulva, penis, and scrotum.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To elucidate the anatomical considerations of the peripelvic area.
  • To outline the benefits and drawbacks of peripelvic reconstruction in oncologic cases.
  • To guide the selection of appropriate reconstructive techniques based on defect specifics.

Main Methods:

  • Review of anatomical structures pertinent to peripelvic reconstruction.
  • Analysis of reconstructive options including local, pedicled, and free flaps.
  • Consideration of patient-specific factors influencing surgical outcomes.

Main Results:

  • The peripelvic area presents unique reconstructive challenges due to its distinct anatomical regions.
  • Reconstruction strategies must account for defect location and donor site availability.
  • Factors such as prior/future radiation, chemotherapy, and cancer cachexia complicate reconstruction.

Conclusions:

  • Peripelvic reconstruction is a complex procedure, predominantly in oncologic settings.
  • Tailored reconstructive approaches are essential for each specific peripelvic defect.
  • Multifactorial patient conditions necessitate individualized treatment planning for successful peripelvic reconstruction.