Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Survival Tree01:19

Survival Tree

445
Survival trees are a non-parametric method used in survival analysis to model the relationship between a set of covariates and the time until an event of interest occurs, often referred to as the "time-to-event" or "survival time." This method is particularly useful when dealing with censored data, where the event has not occurred for some individuals by the end of the study period, or when the exact time of the event is unknown.
 Building a Survival Tree
Constructing a...
445
Cancer Survival Analysis01:21

Cancer Survival Analysis

793
Cancer survival analysis focuses on quantifying and interpreting the time from a key starting point, such as diagnosis or the initiation of treatment, to a specific endpoint, such as remission or death. This analysis provides critical insights into treatment effectiveness and factors that influence patient outcomes, helping to shape clinical decisions and guide prognostic evaluations. A cornerstone of oncology research, survival analysis tackles the challenges of skewed, non-normally...
793
Prediction Intervals01:03

Prediction Intervals

3.5K
The interval estimate of any variable is known as the prediction interval. It helps decide if a point estimate is dependable.
However, the point estimate is most likely not the exact value of the population parameter, but close to it. After calculating point estimates, we construct interval estimates, called confidence intervals or prediction intervals. This prediction interval comprises a range of values unlike the point estimate and is a better predictor of the observed sample value, y. 
3.5K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Associations of body roundness index with cardiovascular and all-cause mortality: NHANES 2001-2018.

Journal of human hypertension·2023
Same author

Huanglian Jiedu plaster ameliorated X-ray-induced radiation dermatitis injury by inhibiting HMGB1-mediated macrophage-inflammatory interaction.

Journal of ethnopharmacology·2022
Same author

Geographic variations in the incidence of congenital hypothyroidism in China: a retrospective study based on 92 million newborns screened in 2013-2018.

Chinese medical journal·2021
Same author

Prostate cancer prediction using the random forest algorithm that takes into account transrectal ultrasound findings, age, and serum levels of prostate-specific antigen.

Asian journal of andrology·2016
Same author

[Diagnosis Values of Back Propagation Neural Network Integrating Age, Transrectal Ultrasound Characteristics and Serum PSA for Prostate Cancer].

Sichuan da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Sichuan University. Medical science edition·2016
Same author

8-bromo-7-methoxychrysin inhibits properties of liver cancer stem cells via downregulation of β-catenin.

World journal of gastroenterology·2014

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Feb 22, 2026

Machine Learning Algorithms for Early Detection of Bone Metastases in an Experimental Rat Model
07:15

Machine Learning Algorithms for Early Detection of Bone Metastases in an Experimental Rat Model

Published on: August 16, 2020

7.6K

[Tree-Augmented NaÏve Bayesian network model for predicting prostate cancer].

Li-Hong Xiao1, Pei-Ran Chen1, Mei Li2

  • 1Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, West China School of Public Health; Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan 610041, China.

Zhonghua Nan Ke Xue = National Journal of Andrology
|October 1, 2017
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study shows that a Tree-Augmented Naïve (TAN) Bayesian network model effectively predicts prostate cancer using age, serum PSA, and ultrasound data. The model demonstrates high accuracy, aiding clinical screening and diagnosis.

Keywords:
ageprostate cancerprostate-specific antigentransrectal ultrasound imagetree-augmented NaÏve Bayesian network

More Related Videos

Comparison of Predictive Performance of Three Lymph Node Staging Systems in Colorectal Signet Ring Cell Carcinoma Based on Machine Learning Model
07:13

Comparison of Predictive Performance of Three Lymph Node Staging Systems in Colorectal Signet Ring Cell Carcinoma Based on Machine Learning Model

Published on: April 18, 2025

774

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Feb 22, 2026

Machine Learning Algorithms for Early Detection of Bone Metastases in an Experimental Rat Model
07:15

Machine Learning Algorithms for Early Detection of Bone Metastases in an Experimental Rat Model

Published on: August 16, 2020

7.6K
Comparison of Predictive Performance of Three Lymph Node Staging Systems in Colorectal Signet Ring Cell Carcinoma Based on Machine Learning Model
07:13

Comparison of Predictive Performance of Three Lymph Node Staging Systems in Colorectal Signet Ring Cell Carcinoma Based on Machine Learning Model

Published on: April 18, 2025

774

Area of Science:

  • Urology
  • Medical Imaging
  • Machine Learning in Healthcare

Background:

  • Prostate cancer diagnosis relies on various clinical and imaging data.
  • Accurate prediction models are crucial for early detection and effective treatment planning.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To assess the efficacy of a Tree-Augmented Naïve (TAN) Bayesian network model.
  • To integrate age, serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA), and transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) imaging for prostate cancer prediction.

Main Methods:

  • Data from 941 male patients undergoing prostate biopsy (Jan 2008-Sep 2011) were analyzed.
  • A TAN Bayesian network model was employed to predict prostate cancer.
  • Model performance was validated against pathological diagnoses.

Main Results:

  • The TAN Bayesian network model achieved an overall accuracy of 85.11%.
  • Key performance metrics included sensitivity (88.37%), specificity (83.67%), positive predictive value (70.37%), and negative predictive value (94.25%).

Conclusions:

  • The TAN Bayesian network model demonstrates significant value in predicting prostate cancer.
  • This model can enhance clinical screening and diagnostic capabilities for prostate cancer.