Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Random and Systematic Errors01:20

Random and Systematic Errors

15.5K
Scientists always try their best to record measurements with the utmost accuracy and precision. However, sometimes errors do occur. These errors can be random or systematic. Random errors are observed due to the inconsistency or fluctuation in the measurement process, or variations in the quantity itself that is being measured. Such errors fluctuate from being greater than or less than the true value in repeated measurements. Consider a scientist measuring the length of an earthworm using a...
15.5K
Sampling Continuous Time Signal01:11

Sampling Continuous Time Signal

775
In signal processing, a continuous-time signal can be sampled using an impulse-train sampling technique, followed by the zero-order hold method. Impulse-train sampling involves the use of a periodic impulse train, which consists of a series of delta functions spaced at regular intervals determined by the sampling period. When a continuous-time signal is multiplied by this impulse train, it generates impulses with amplitudes corresponding to the signal's values at the sampling points.
In the...
775
Propagation of Uncertainty from Systematic Error01:10

Propagation of Uncertainty from Systematic Error

1.5K
The atomic mass of an element varies due to the relative ratio of its isotopes. A sample's relative proportion of oxygen isotopes influences its average atomic mass. For instance, if we were to measure the atomic mass of oxygen from a sample, the mass would be a weighted average of the isotopic masses of oxygen in that sample. Since a single sample is not likely to perfectly reflect the true atomic mass of oxygen for all the molecules of oxygen on Earth, the mass we obtain from this...
1.5K
Random Error01:04

Random Error

9.9K
Random or indeterminate errors originate from various uncontrollable variables, such as variations in environmental conditions, instrument imperfections, or the inherent variability of the phenomena being measured. Usually, these errors cannot be predicted, estimated, or characterized because their direction and magnitude often vary in magnitude and direction even during consecutive measurements. As a result, they are difficult to eliminate. However, the aggregate effect of these errors can be...
9.9K
Interference: Path Lengths01:10

Interference: Path Lengths

2.3K
Consider two sources of sound, that may or may not be in phase, emitting waves at a single frequency, and consider the frequencies to be the same.
Two special sources may be considered when they are in phase. This can be easily achieved by feeding the two sources from the same source. An example would be synchronizing the two speakers by feeding them with the same source, such as the sound waves produced by a tuning fork. This setup ensures that the two sources have the same frequency and are...
2.3K
Propagation of Uncertainty from Random Error00:59

Propagation of Uncertainty from Random Error

2.0K
An experiment often consists of more than a single step. In this case, measurements at each step give rise to uncertainty. Because the measurements occur in successive steps, the uncertainty in one step necessarily contributes to that in the subsequent step. As we perform statistical analysis on these types of experiments, we must learn to account for the propagation of uncertainty from one step to the next. The propagation of uncertainty depends on the type of arithmetic operation performed on...
2.0K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Audiometric detection thresholds for older adults with normal and impaired hearing predict recognition of spectrally and temporally degraded speech in speech-modulated noise.

International journal of audiology·2026
Same author

Exploring Dysphonic Artificial Intelligence Voice Cloning for Speech Intelligibility in Noise.

Journal of voice : official journal of the Voice Foundation·2026
Same author

Parameter efficient speaker adaptation for enhancement of bone-conducted speech.

JASA express letters·2026
Same author

Auditory and cognitive contributions to recognition of degraded speech in noise: Individual differences among older adults.

PloS one·2025
Same author

Eye Movements of Persons with Aphasia During Connected-Text Reading.

Aphasiology·2025
Same author

Oral Reading Prosody and Comprehension in Persons With Aphasia: A Preliminary Investigation.

American journal of speech-language pathology·2024

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Feb 22, 2026

Author Spotlight: Investigating the Impact of Emotional Prosodies on Voice Recognition and Perception
05:48

Author Spotlight: Investigating the Impact of Emotional Prosodies on Voice Recognition and Perception

Published on: August 9, 2024

2.0K

Speech recognition error patterns for steady-state noise and interrupted speech.

Kimberly G Smith1, Daniel Fogerty2

  • 1Department of Speech Pathology and Audiology, University of South Alabama, 5721 Drive North, Mobile, Alabama 36688, USA kimberlysmith@southalabama.edu.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
|October 2, 2017
PubMed
Summary

Adverse listening conditions impact speech recognition errors. Young adults experienced more phonemic substitutions and omissions in steady-state noise, with part-word errors increasing as speech clarity decreased.

More Related Videos

Systematic Hearing Performance Evaluation Process for Adolescents with Cochlear Implantation at Early Ages
06:04

Systematic Hearing Performance Evaluation Process for Adolescents with Cochlear Implantation at Early Ages

Published on: March 24, 2023

879
Foreign Accent and Forensic Speaker Identification in Voice Lineups: The Influence of Acoustic Features Based on Prosody
09:09

Foreign Accent and Forensic Speaker Identification in Voice Lineups: The Influence of Acoustic Features Based on Prosody

Published on: September 27, 2024

920

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Feb 22, 2026

Author Spotlight: Investigating the Impact of Emotional Prosodies on Voice Recognition and Perception
05:48

Author Spotlight: Investigating the Impact of Emotional Prosodies on Voice Recognition and Perception

Published on: August 9, 2024

2.0K
Systematic Hearing Performance Evaluation Process for Adolescents with Cochlear Implantation at Early Ages
06:04

Systematic Hearing Performance Evaluation Process for Adolescents with Cochlear Implantation at Early Ages

Published on: March 24, 2023

879
Foreign Accent and Forensic Speaker Identification in Voice Lineups: The Influence of Acoustic Features Based on Prosody
09:09

Foreign Accent and Forensic Speaker Identification in Voice Lineups: The Influence of Acoustic Features Based on Prosody

Published on: September 27, 2024

920

Area of Science:

  • Auditory perception
  • Speech processing
  • Human-computer interaction

Background:

  • Adverse listening conditions significantly affect speech recognition accuracy.
  • Understanding error patterns is crucial for improving speech recognition systems.
  • Previous research has explored various noise types, but specific error analyses across conditions are needed.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the types and frequencies of speech recognition errors under different adverse listening conditions.
  • To analyze how noise type (steady-state vs. interrupted) and speech proportion affect listener error patterns.
  • To identify specific error types associated with particular noise characteristics.

Main Methods:

  • Young adults listened to sentences degraded by steady-state or interrupted noise at varying speech proportions.
  • Participants repeated the degraded sentences.
  • Recognition errors were categorized (phonemic substitution, whole word omission, part word) and analyzed based on noise type and speech preservation levels.

Main Results:

  • Decreased word recognition correlated with increased phonemic substitutions and whole word omissions across all noise types.
  • Steady-state noise elicited a higher frequency of whole word omissions and substitution errors compared to interrupted noise.
  • Part word errors were most prevalent in steady-state noise and when the preserved speech proportion was minimal.

Conclusions:

  • The type of adverse listening condition influences the specific patterns of speech recognition errors.
  • Steady-state noise poses a greater challenge, leading to more significant word-level errors.
  • Minimizing speech proportion in noisy environments exacerbates part-word errors, highlighting the need for robust noise reduction strategies.