Safety and efficacy of early feeding based on clinical assessment at 4 hours after ERCP: a prospective

Chan Hyuk Park1, Jang Han Jung2, Bomi Hyun2

  • 1Department of Internal Medicine, Hanyang University Guri Hospital, Hanyang University College of Medicine, Gyeonggi-do, Republic of Korea.

Insights

Early refeeding after ERCP, guided by clinical assessment and amylase levels, is safe and reduces costs. Patients can resume eating 4 hours post-procedure without increasing post-ERCP pancreatitis risk.

Area of Science:

  • Gastroenterology
  • Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography (ERCP)
  • Pancreatitis

Background:

  • The optimal timing for resuming oral intake following ERCP remains uncertain.
  • Current practices vary, with some institutions advocating for a 24-hour fasting period post-ERCP, while others permit earlier refeeding.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To assess the risk of post-ERCP pancreatitis (PEP) in patients who undergo early refeeding.
  • To evaluate the safety and efficacy of initiating oral intake 4 hours after ERCP based on clinical parameters and serum amylase levels.

Main Methods:

  • A randomized controlled trial involving patients undergoing ERCP.
  • Patients were stratified based on absence of abdominal pain/tenderness and serum amylase levels (<1.5x upper limit of normal) at 4 hours post-ERCP.
  • Participants were randomized to either a 4-hour or 24-hour fasting group before resuming oral intake.

Main Results:

  • No significant difference in PEP incidence was observed between the 4-hour fasting group (2.2%) and the 24-hour fasting group (3.6%).
  • Early refeeding (4-hour group) was found to be non-inferior to prolonged fasting (24-hour group) regarding PEP rates.
  • Total medical costs associated with ERCP were significantly lower in the early refeeding group.

Conclusions:

  • Initiating early oral feeding 4 hours after ERCP in selected patients (asymptomatic with normal amylase) does not elevate the risk of PEP.
  • Early refeeding is associated with reduced medical costs, suggesting a more efficient patient management strategy.
Abstract