Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 22, 2026

Novel and Innovative Hybrid Technique for Type A Aortic Dissection
Published on: March 28, 2025
Three-Year Major Clinical Outcomes of Angiography-Guided Single Stenting Technique in Non-Complex Left Main Coronary
Yong Hoon Kim1, Ae-Young Her1, Seung-Woon Rha2,3
1Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Kangwon National University School of Medicine.
Insights
Angiography-guided percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for non-complex left main coronary artery disease using drug-eluting stents showed similar 3-year outcomes to intravascular ultrasound (IVUS)-guided PCI. Angiography guidance is a viable option for selected cases.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Interventional Cardiology
- Medical Devices
Background:
- Limited long-term data exists comparing angiography- versus intravascular ultrasound (IVUS)-guided percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for non-complex left main coronary artery (LMCA) disease using single stenting in the drug-eluting stent (DES) era.
- Intravascular imaging guidance is often considered optimal for LMCA stenting, but its superiority over angiography alone in specific scenarios remains under investigation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the 3-year clinical outcomes of angiography-guided versus IVUS-guided single stenting in patients with non-complex LMCA disease.
- To determine if angiography-guided PCI is non-inferior to IVUS-guided PCI in preventing major adverse cardiac events (MACE).
Main Methods:
- A prospective study included 196 patients with non-complex LMCA disease undergoing single stenting, divided into angiography-guided (n=74) and IVUS-guided (n=122) groups.
- The primary endpoint was MACE, defined as total death, myocardial infarction (MI), target lesion revascularization (TLR), target vessel revascularization (TVR), and non-target vessel revascularization (Non-TVR).
- Propensity score (PS) adjusted analysis was performed to control for potential confounders.
Main Results:
- During 3-year follow-up, no significant difference was observed in PS-adjusted rates of total death, cardiac death, or MI between the angiography-guided and IVUS-guided groups.
- Rates of TLR and combined TVR/Non-TVR were also comparable between the two groups.
- The overall MACE rate was not significantly different (HR: 0.63, 95% CI: 0.33-1.17; P=0.149), suggesting similar efficacy.
Conclusions:
- Angiography-guided single stenting for non-complex LMCA disease demonstrates comparable 3-year clinical outcomes to IVUS-guided stenting in the DES era.
- While IVUS guidance is ideal, angiography guidance can be a suitable alternative for LMCA PCI in carefully selected patients.
- These findings support the consideration of angiography guidance in specific LMCA interventions, potentially broadening treatment accessibility.
Abstract:
There is limited long-term comparative clinical outcome data concerning angiography- versus intravascular ultrasound (IVUS)-guided percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in non-complex left main coronary artery (LMCA) disease treated with the single stenting technique in the drug-eluting stent (DES) era.The aim of this study was to investigate whether angiography-guided stenting is comparable to IVUS-guided stenting during 3-year clinical follow-up periods in patients with non-complex LM disease treated with the single stenting technique.A total of 196 patients treated with either angiography-guided (n = 74) or IVUS-guided (n = 122) PCI were included. The primary outcome was the occurrence of major adverse cardiac events (MACE) defined as total death, non-fatal myocardial infarction (MI), target lesion revascularization (TLR), target vessel revascularization (TVR), and non-target vessel revascularization (Non-TVR). To adjust for any potential confounders, propensity score (PS) adjusted analysis was performed.During 3-year follow-up, the PS adjusted Cox-proportional hazard ratio (HR) was not significantly different between the two groups for total death, cardiac death, and MI. Also, TLR and the combined rates of TVR and non-TVR were not significantly different. Finally, MACE was not significantly different between the two groups (HR: 0.63, 95% Confidence interval (CI): 0.33-1.17; P = 0.149).Angiography-guided PCI for non-complex LMCA diseases treated with the single stenting technique showed comparable results compared with IVUS-guided PCI in reducing clinical events during 3-year clinical follow-up in the DES era. Although IVUS guided PCI is the ideal strategy, angiography-guided PCI can be an option for LMCA PCI in some selected cases.
Related Concept Videos
Cardiac Catheterization III: Left Heart Catheterization
Acute Coronary Syndrome III: Diagnostic Studies
Coronary Artery Disease V: Interprofessional Care
Mitral Stenosis III: Medical Management
Acute Coronary Syndrome I: Introduction
Angina IV: Management