Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 22, 2026

Intraoperative Assessment of Resection Margins in Oral Cavity Cancer: This is the Way
Published on: May 10, 2021
The criteria of "inoperability"
Stefano Romagnoli1, Laura Paparella, Paolo Boninsegni
1Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi, Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care. stefano.romagnoli@unifi.it.
Abstract:
In the literature, the term "inoperable" mainly refers to two specific clinical aspects: cancer staging and technical difficulty/impossibility in performing. In light of this clarification, the statement "the patient cannot be anesthetized" has no medical foundation. On the contrary, the physicians have to carefully stratify the perioperative risk and optimize the patients' preoperative clinical status. In order to perform a precise risk stratification, the European Society of Cardiology and the European Society of Anaesthesiology have joined and published the guidelines for the perioperative cardiovascular management of patients scheduled to undergo non-cardiac surgery. The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS NSQIP) represents the most complete and accurate prediction tool so far. It includes 21 preoperative factors relating to demographics, comorbidities and procedures able to predict outcomes based on preoperative risk factors such as death, cardiac complications, pneumonia, and acute kidney injury. The present article will address aspects related to common aspects concerning modifiable and non-modifiable that should be addressed in every patient to whom elective surgery has been scheduled.
Related Concept Videos
Routh-Hurwitz Criterion I
To apply the Routh-Hurwitz criterion, a Routh table is constructed. The table's rows are labeled with powers of the complex frequency variable s, starting from the...
Routh-Hurwitz Criterion II
The first scenario occurs when a singular zero appears in the first column of the Routh table. This situation creates a division by zero issues. To resolve this, a small positive or negative number, denoted as epsilon (∈), is substituted for the zero. The stability analysis proceeds by assuming a sign for ∈. If ∈ is positive, any sign change in the first...
Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - II
Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - I
Barriers to Effective Communication II
Cultural barriers:
Differences in values, beliefs, religion, knowledge, and tradition can significantly impact communication. Awareness of nonverbal cues is critical, especially when conversing with a patient from a different culture. What appears appropriate in one culture may be inappropriate in another.
Semantic barriers:
As a result of their tendency to use...
Angina II: Classification

