Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 22, 2026

The WATCHMAN Left Atrial Appendage Closure Device for Atrial Fibrillation
Published on: February 28, 2012
How to define the relative contraindications to oral anticoagulant therapy
1Istituti Clinici Scientifici Maugeri, IRCCS. roberto.pedretti@icsmaugeri.it.
Insights
Physicians should not withhold anticoagulant therapy solely based on high bleeding risk scores. Instead, identify and manage treatable bleeding factors to optimize patient outcomes and anticoagulant benefits.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Pharmacology
- Clinical Medicine
Background:
- Current guidelines lack clear definitions for absolute versus relative contraindications to anticoagulant therapy.
- European Society of Cardiology guidelines for atrial fibrillation (AF) incorporate risk factors into scores but still allow for clinical judgment.
Purpose of the Study:
- To clarify the distinction between absolute and relative contraindications for anticoagulant therapy.
- To propose an optimized approach for managing bleeding risk in patients undergoing anticoagulant therapy.
Main Methods:
- Review of current anticoagulant therapy guidelines, focusing on contraindications and bleeding risk assessment.
- Analysis of the role of risk scores versus clinical judgment in decision-making.
Main Results:
- A high bleeding risk score alone should not contraindicate anticoagulant therapy.
- Identifiable and treatable bleeding risk factors should be addressed proactively.
Conclusions:
- A hierarchical classification of bleeding risk factors combined with risk scores offers the best strategy.
- This approach aims to maximize the benefits of anticoagulant therapy across diverse clinical scenarios.
Abstract:
There is currently a lack of consensus on which anticoagulant therapy contraindications should be considered "absolute" and which should be considered "relative". Guidelines do not clearly identify absolute and relative contraindications to anticoagulant therapy. Recent guidelines on AF of the European Society of Cardiology underline the relevance of several factors and their use in scores, leaving anyway space to the clinical judgment of the physician. A high bleeding risk score should generally not result per se in a contraindication to anticoagulant therapy. Rather, bleeding risk factors should be identified and treatable factors corrected. A combined use of a more hierarchical classification of the different bleeding risk factors and the risk scores probably represents the best approach to maximize the benefit of anticoagulant therapy in various clinical settings.
Related Concept Videos
Anticoagulant Drugs: Vitamin K Antagonists and Direct Oral Anticoagulants
Warfarin, a prominent vitamin K antagonist family member, exerts its effect by inhibiting the enzyme VKORC1 (vitamin K epoxide reductase complex 1). By hindering this enzyme, warfarin...
Anticoagulant Drugs: Low-Molecular-Weight Heparins
Venous Thrombosis III: Interprofessional Care
Antiplatelet Drugs: Prostaglandin Synthesis, P2Y12 and Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa Inhibitors
Prostaglandin synthesis inhibitors, exemplified by the widely known aspirin, wield their power by irreversibly acetylating...
Therapeutic Index
Disorders of Hemostasis
Thromboembolic Disorders
Two factors primarily cause thromboembolic conditions.

