Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Establishing Human Observer Criterion in Evaluating Artificial Social Intelligence Agents in a Search and Rescue Task.

Topics in cognitive science·2023
Same author

Temporal Sensitivity and Latency During Teleoperation: Using Track Clearance to Understand Errors in Future Projection.

Human factors·2021
Same author

Attributing Blame to Robots: I. The Influence of Robot Autonomy.

Human factors·2019
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Feb 22, 2026

An Emerging Target Paradigm to Evoke Fast Visuomotor Responses on Human Upper Limb Muscles
09:27

An Emerging Target Paradigm to Evoke Fast Visuomotor Responses on Human Upper Limb Muscles

Published on: August 25, 2020

4.8K

Using Temporal Sensitivity to Predict Performance Under Latency in Teleoperation.

Federico Scholcover1, Douglas J Gillan1

  • 1North Carolina State University, Raleigh.

Human Factors
|October 3, 2017
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Individuals with higher temporal sensitivity made more errors in tasks with latency, suggesting a speed/accuracy trade-off. This research explores temporal sensitivity and its impact on task performance under delay.

Keywords:
human-robot interactionindividual differencespsychophysical methodsteleoperationtime perception

More Related Videos

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments
13:00

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments

Published on: January 23, 2017

10.4K
The Power of Interstimulus Interval for the Assessment of Temporal Processing in Rodents
10:27

The Power of Interstimulus Interval for the Assessment of Temporal Processing in Rodents

Published on: April 19, 2019

7.4K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Feb 22, 2026

An Emerging Target Paradigm to Evoke Fast Visuomotor Responses on Human Upper Limb Muscles
09:27

An Emerging Target Paradigm to Evoke Fast Visuomotor Responses on Human Upper Limb Muscles

Published on: August 25, 2020

4.8K
Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments
13:00

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments

Published on: January 23, 2017

10.4K
The Power of Interstimulus Interval for the Assessment of Temporal Processing in Rodents
10:27

The Power of Interstimulus Interval for the Assessment of Temporal Processing in Rodents

Published on: April 19, 2019

7.4K

Area of Science:

  • Human-Computer Interaction
  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Robotics

Background:

  • Increasing latency in human-robot interaction degrades performance, affecting task speed and accuracy.
  • Tools like predictive displays aim to mitigate performance costs associated with latency.
  • Understanding individual differences, particularly temporal sensitivity, is crucial for optimizing performance in delayed systems.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the relationship between temporal sensitivity and task performance under one-way latency.
  • To determine if temporal sensitivity predicts performance metrics like completion time and error rates.

Main Methods:

  • Participants completed a time estimation task and a remote-controlled car driving task with varying input-response latencies (400-1000 ms).
  • Performance was measured by task completion time and the number of errors made.
  • Temporal sensitivity was assessed through a time estimation task.

Main Results:

  • Temporal sensitivity predicted the total number of errors but not the overall completion time.
  • A significant relationship was found between temporal sensitivity and error rate (errors per minute), indicating a potential speed/accuracy trade-off.
  • Individual differences in temporal sensitivity influence performance in latency-bound tasks.

Conclusions:

  • This study provides initial evidence linking temporal sensitivity to performance decrements in tasks involving latency.
  • Findings suggest that temporal sensitivity may be a key factor in managing speed-accuracy trade-offs in delayed control systems.
  • Applications include developing targeted training for teleoperators (e.g., astronauts, surgeons) facing latency challenges.