Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 21, 2026

Pulse Wave Velocity Testing in the Baltimore Longitudinal Study of Aging
Published on: February 7, 2014
Numerical assessment and comparison of pulse wave velocity methods aiming at measuring aortic stiffness
Hasan Obeid1,2, Gilles Soulat3, Elie Mousseaux3
1bioMMeda, Institute Biomedical Technology, Ghent University, Campus UZ, De Pintelaan 185, B-9000 Ghent, Belgium.
Abstract:
Pulse waveform analyses have become established components of cardiovascular research. Recently several methods have been proposed as tools to measure aortic pulse wave velocity (aPWV). The carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity (cf-PWV), the current clinical gold standard method for the noninvasive assessment of aPWV, uses the carotid-to-femoral pulse transit time difference (cf-PTT) and an estimated path length to derive cf-PWV.
Objective:
The heart-ankle PWV (ha-PWV), brachial-ankle PWV (ba-PWV) and finger-toe (ft-PWV) are also methods presuming to approximate aPWV based on time delays between physiological cardiovascular signals at two locations (~heart-ankle PTT, ha-PTT; ~brachial-ankle PTT, ba-PTT; ~finger-toe PTT, ft-PTT) and a path length typically derived from the subject's height. To test the validity of these methods, we used a detailed 1D arterial network model (143 arterial segments) including the foot and hand circulation.
Approach:
The arterial tree dimensions and properties were taken from the literature and completed with data from patient scans. We calculated PTTs with all the methods mentioned above. The calculated PTTs were compared with the aortic PTT (aPTT), which is considered as the absolute reference method in this study.
Main Results:
The correlation between methods and aPTT was good and significant, cf-PTT (R 2 = 0.97; P < 0.001; mean difference 5 ± 2 ms), ha-PTT (R 2 = 0.96; P < 0.001; 150 ± 23 ms), ba-PTT (R 2 = 0.96; P < 0.001; 70 ± 13 ms) and ft-PTT (R 2 = 0.95; P < 0.001; 14 ± 10 ms). Consequently, good correlation was also observed for the PWV values derived with the tested methods, but absolute values differed because of the different path lengths used.
Significance:
In conclusion, our computer model-based analyses demonstrate that for PWV methods based on peripheral signals, pulse transit time differences closely correlate with the aortic transit time, supporting the use of these methods in clinical practice.
Related Concept Videos
Assessment of blood pressure in brachial artery(two-step method)
Assessment of blood pressure in brachial artery(one-step method)
Prepare for the Procedure:
Pulse
The pulse serves as a clinical...
Assessing Blood pressure using a doppler ultrasound
Pre-Procedural Guidelines for Doppler Ultrasound Blood Pressure Assessment:
Preparation of Equipment:
Sites for measuring blood pressure
The Brachial Artery: Primary Site for Blood Pressure Measurement
Assessment of apical radial pulse
The A-R pulse assessment involves simultaneous evaluation of the apical and radial pulses. When the apical and radial pulse rates vary, this assessment helps identify a pulse deficit.
Pre-Procedural Preparation

