Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 21, 2026

Author Spotlight: Methodologies and Advancements of Chronic Pain Management Research
Published on: January 5, 2024
Patients with fibromyalgia rarely fulfil classification criteria for axial spondyloarthritis
Xenofon Baraliakos1, Andrea Regel1, Uta Kiltz1
1Rheumazentrum Ruhrgebiet, Ruhr-University Bochum, Herne, Germany.
Background:
The Assessments of Spondyloarthritis international Society (ASAS) classification criteria for axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) have been criticized because of insufficient differentiation towards FM. The aim of this study was to compare the performance of currently used classification criteria in patients diagnosed with axSpA or FM.
Methods:
Patients were prospectively included if diagnosed with axSpA or FM by the treating rheumatologist and evaluated by an independent examiner for fulfilment of the classification criteria for axSpA (ASAS criteria) and/or FM (1990 ACR classification and 2010 ACR diagnostic criteria). Patients with axSpA were stratified based on classification as non-radiographic axSpA (nr-axSpA) or AS. Symptom severity was assessed by established disease-related questionnaires.
Results:
Overall, 300 patients were included, 100 with FM and 200 with axSpA of which 100 each had nr-axSpA and AS. Almost all FM patients fulfilled the 2010 (100%) and 1990 ACR criteria (98%) for FM, but only 2% fulfilled the ASAS criteria. When calculations were based on only the FM patients with available HLA-B27 results (n = 40), the proportion fulfilling the ASAS criteria was 5%. All axSpA patients met the ASAS criteria but also the 2010 (24%) and 1990 (13.5%) FM criteria. More patients with AS (29% and 19%) than with nr-axSpA (19% and 8%) fulfilled the 2010 and 1990 FM criteria, respectively.
Conclusion:
FM patients only rarely fulfil classification criteria for axSpA but some axSpA patients also fulfil FM criteria. Since this was more frequent in patients with AS it may be related to the severity and duration of chronic pain in axSpA patients. Assessment instruments evaluated in axSpA are not disease-specific. The phenomenon of central pain sensitization in rheumatic diseases deserves more study.
Insights
The Assessments of Spondyloarthritis international Society (ASAS) criteria rarely identify fibromyalgia (FM) patients, but some axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) patients meet FM criteria. This suggests axSpA assessment tools may lack specificity for chronic pain conditions.
Area of Science:
- Rheumatology
- Clinical Immunology
- Pain Medicine
Background:
- The Assessments of Spondyloarthritis international Society (ASAS) classification criteria for axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) face criticism for inadequate differentiation from fibromyalgia (FM).
- Comparing the performance of existing classification criteria in axSpA and FM patients is crucial for diagnostic clarity.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of ASAS axSpA criteria against established FM classification criteria.
- To determine the overlap in criterion fulfillment between axSpA and FM patient cohorts.
Main Methods:
- Prospective inclusion of 300 patients diagnosed with axSpA or FM by their rheumatologist.
- Evaluation of ASAS axSpA criteria and ACR FM criteria (1990/2010) by an independent examiner.
- Stratification of axSpA patients into non-radiographic axSpA (nr-axSpA) and ankylosing spondylitis (AS), with symptom severity assessment.
Main Results:
- Nearly all FM patients (100% 2010 ACR, 98% 1990 ACR) met FM criteria, while only 2% met ASAS axSpA criteria.
- All axSpA patients met ASAS axSpA criteria, but a significant proportion also met FM criteria (24% 2010 ACR, 13.5% 1990 ACR).
- Fulfillment of FM criteria was higher in AS patients (29% 2010 ACR, 19% 1990 ACR) compared to nr-axSpA patients (19% 2010 ACR, 8% 1990 ACR).
Conclusions:
- FM patients infrequently meet axSpA classification criteria, but axSpA patients sometimes meet FM criteria, particularly those with AS.
- The overlap suggests that current axSpA assessment instruments may not be disease-specific, potentially due to central pain sensitization.
- Further research into central pain sensitization in rheumatic diseases is warranted.
More Related Videos
06:59Catheter-based Endovascular Angioplasty for Fibrosing Mediastinitis-associated Pulmonary Vein Stenosis
Published on: August 26, 2025
04:50Preliminary Study on Acupuncture Combined with Grain-sized Moxibustion for Treating Rheumatoid Arthritis with Finger Joint Pain
Published on: May 16, 2025
Related Concept Videos
Functional Classification of Joints
The functional classification of joints is determined by the amount of mobility between the adjacent bones. Joints are functionally classified as a synarthrosis or immobile joint, an amphiarthrosis or slightly moveable joint, or as a diarthrosis, a freely moveable joint. Fibrous and cartilaginous joints can be functionally classified as either synarthroses or amphiarthroses, whereas all synovial joints are classified as diarthroses.
Synarthrosis
An...
Structural Classification of Joints
A fibrous joint is where the adjacent bones are united by fibrous connective...
Chronic Bowel Disorders: Introduction
Irritable Bowel Syndrome (IBS) is a common disorder affecting the gastrointestinal tract. The distinctive feature is recurrent abdominal pain associated with altered bowel movements, manifesting as constipation, diarrhea, or fluctuating between both. The...
Layers of Connective Tissue Proper
Classification of Skeletal Muscle Fibers
Slow-Twitch Muscle Fibers
Slow oxidative, muscle fibers appear red due to large numbers of capillaries and high levels of...
Structural Joints: Fibrous Joints
Suture
All the bones of the skull, except for the mandible, are joined to each other by a fibrous joint called a suture. The fibrous connective tissue found at a suture strongly unites the adjacent skull bones and thus helps to protect the brain and form the face. In...