Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 21, 2026
Author Spotlight: Advancing Pathogen Diagnostics with Standardized LAMP
Published on: September 8, 2023
Comparison of two algorithms to confirm and discriminate samples initially reactive for nucleic acid amplification
Aseem Kumar Tiwari1, Ravi C Dara1, Dinesh Arora1
1Department of Transfusion Medicine, Medanta - The Medicity, Gurgaon, Haryana, India.
Background:
Blood centers in India have published individual donor nucleic acid testing (ID-NAT) data based on an algorithm (Algorithm A) where serologically negative, NAT reactive sample was subsequently tested with discriminatory NAT (d-NAT), and on the basis of d-NAT, initial reactive samples were classified as "NAT yield" or inconclusive. We followed Algorithm B based on replicate testing and Ultrio Plus assay and compared the results with Algorithm A with Ultrio assay.
Materials And Methods:
Results of ID-NAT using two algorithms were analyzed.
Results:
A total of 88,583 (31,844 with Algorithm A and 56,739 with Algorithm B) samples were tested. Among serology nonreactive donations, NAT inconclusive results came down from 95.2% in Algorithm A to 73.1% in Algorithm B (P = 0.0001). Discriminated yield (DY) rate went up from 4.7% in Algorithm A to 21.9% in Algorithm B (P = 0.001).
Conclusion:
The study data suggest that replicate testing strategy and Ultrio Plus reduce the number of "inconclusive results" seen with earlier commonly used algorithm. We recommend a replicate testing strategy in ID-NAT testing since it will increase the DY and will eliminate the unnecessary discriminatory tests.
