Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

A Systematic Review of Electroencephalography (EEG) Studies Investigating Mathematical Efficiency: Current Insights and Future Directions.

Advances in experimental medicine and biology·2026
Same author

Exposure to per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances and alterations in plasma microRNA profiles in children.

Environmental research·2024
Same author

Correction to: Development of a Protein Biochip Platform for Parkinson's Disease.

Advances in experimental medicine and biology·2022
Same author

A Sensor-Based Perspective in Early-Stage Parkinson's Disease: Current State and the Need for Machine Learning Processes.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)·2022
Same author

The Importance of Diagnostic and Prognostic Biomarker Identification and Classification Towards Understanding ALS Pathogenesis.

Advances in experimental medicine and biology·2022
Same author

Genetic Pathways Involved in the Pathogenesis of Parkinson's Disease.

Advances in experimental medicine and biology·2022

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Feb 21, 2026

Utilizing Electroencephalography Measurements for Comparison of Task-Specific Neural Efficiencies: Spatial Intelligence Tasks
06:57

Utilizing Electroencephalography Measurements for Comparison of Task-Specific Neural Efficiencies: Spatial Intelligence Tasks

Published on: August 9, 2016

12.0K

EEG Analysis of the Neurofeedback Training Effect in Algorithmic Thinking.

Antonia Plerou1, Panayiotis Vlamos2, Aikaterini Margetaki3

  • 1Department of Informatics, Bioinformatics and Human Electrophysiology Laboratory, Ionian University, Corfu, Greece. tplerou@ionio.gr.

Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology
|October 4, 2017
PubMed
Summary

Neurofeedback training shows significant brain activity variations in children performing algorithmic tasks. This study highlights potential for neurofeedback in evaluating algorithmic thinking and addressing math learning challenges.

Keywords:
Algorithmic thinkingAlpha wavesBeta wavesEEGLearning disabilitiesNeurofeedback training

More Related Videos

A Protocol for the Administration of Real-Time fMRI Neurofeedback Training
07:05

A Protocol for the Administration of Real-Time fMRI Neurofeedback Training

Published on: August 24, 2017

11.5K
The Combination of Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation and Electroencephalogram
06:14

The Combination of Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation and Electroencephalogram

Published on: October 10, 2025

576

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Feb 21, 2026

Utilizing Electroencephalography Measurements for Comparison of Task-Specific Neural Efficiencies: Spatial Intelligence Tasks
06:57

Utilizing Electroencephalography Measurements for Comparison of Task-Specific Neural Efficiencies: Spatial Intelligence Tasks

Published on: August 9, 2016

12.0K
A Protocol for the Administration of Real-Time fMRI Neurofeedback Training
07:05

A Protocol for the Administration of Real-Time fMRI Neurofeedback Training

Published on: August 24, 2017

11.5K
The Combination of Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation and Electroencephalogram
06:14

The Combination of Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation and Electroencephalogram

Published on: October 10, 2025

576

Area of Science:

  • Neuroscience
  • Cognitive Science
  • Educational Psychology

Background:

  • Algorithmic thinking ability lacks comprehensive analysis using neuroscience and brain imaging.
  • Research on neurofeedback's impact on learning disabilities, particularly mathematics disorders, is limited.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate brain activity and activation differences between neurofeedback-trained participants and controls during continuous algorithmic tasks.
  • To assess the efficacy of two neurofeedback training protocols for evaluating algorithmic thinking ability in children.

Main Methods:

  • Electroencephalography (EEG) analysis of brain activity during algorithmic task performance.
  • Comparative study involving 182 upper-education children, with two neurofeedback training protocols and a control group.

Main Results:

  • Statistically significant variations observed in mean Standard Deviation (SD) values across various brainwave ratios during algorithmic task-solving epochs.
  • Differences in brain activity patterns were identified between the neurofeedback trained group and the control group.

Conclusions:

  • Neurofeedback training can modulate brain activity associated with algorithmic thinking.
  • The findings suggest neurofeedback as a viable tool for assessing and potentially enhancing algorithmic thinking abilities.
  • Further research is warranted to explore the long-term effects and specific applications of neurofeedback in educational contexts.