Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 21, 2026

Middle Cerebral Artery Occlusion Allowing Reperfusion via Common Carotid Artery Repair in Mice
Published on: January 23, 2019
Insignificant C1 effects cannot be called 'marginally significant'.
1a Department. of Movement, Human and Health Sciences , University of Rome "Foro Italico" , Rome , Italy.
This commentary argues that visual attention does not significantly affect the earliest event-related potential (ERP) C1 component. Numerical differences in attended versus unattended conditions lacked statistical significance in cited studies.
Area of Science:
- Neuroscience
- Cognitive Psychology
- Visual Perception
Background:
- The earliest event-related potential (ERP) component, C1, is associated with initial visual processing.
- Previous research has explored the influence of attention on early visual ERPs, with some studies suggesting attentional modulation of C1.
- Slotnick (this issue) proposed that specific experimental conditions might reveal attentional effects on C1.
Purpose of the Study:
- To critically evaluate Slotnick's claims regarding attentional modulation of the C1 component.
- To clarify the statistical significance of previously reported C1 attention effects.
- To assert that significant C1 attention effects were not present in the cited literature.
Main Methods:
- Re-examination of statistical analyses from previously published studies on C1 and attention.
- Focus on the interpretation of numerical differences versus statistical significance in ERP data.
- Critique of the presentation of findings in Slotnick's commentary.
Main Results:
- Statistical tests for C1 attention effects in the cited papers were not significant.
- While C1 amplitude was sometimes numerically larger under attended conditions, this did not meet statistical thresholds for significance.
- The interpretation of Slotnick's commentary on these papers is contested.
Conclusions:
- There is no compelling evidence for significant attentional modulation of the C1 component based on the re-examined literature.
- Numerical trends should not be mistaken for statistically validated effects in ERP research.
- The commentary clarifies that previously cited studies do not support significant C1 attention effects.
Related Concept Videos
Significance Testing: Overview
Sign Test for Matched Pairs
To conduct the sign test, we first calculate the differences in...
Statistical Significance
Critical Region, Critical Values and Significance Level
In hypothesis testing, a sample statistic is converted to a test statistic using z, t, or chi-square distribution. A critical region is an area under the curve in probability distributions demarcated by the critical value. When the test statistic falls in this region, it suggests that the null hypothesis must be rejected. As this region contains all those values of the...
Correlation and Causation
Correlation versus Causation
If the dependent variable increases or decreases when the independent variable increases, there is a positive or negative...
Comparing Experimental Results: Student's t-Test

