Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Steps in Outbreak Investigation01:18

Steps in Outbreak Investigation

622
In the ever-evolving field of public health, statistical analysis serves as a cornerstone for understanding and managing disease outbreaks. By leveraging various statistical tools, health professionals can predict potential outbreaks, analyze ongoing situations, and devise effective responses to mitigate impact. For that to happen, there are a few possible stages of the analysis:
622
Hindsight Biases01:12

Hindsight Biases

4.3K
Hindsight bias leads you to believe that the event you just experienced was predictable, even though it really wasn’t. In other words, you knew all along that things would turn out the way they did. Can you relate this to the phrase "Hindsight is 20/20" now? 
4.3K
Predicting Reaction Outcomes02:24

Predicting Reaction Outcomes

11.1K
Kinetics describes the rate and path by which a reaction occurs. In contrast, thermodynamics deals with state functions and describes the properties, behavior, and components of a system. It is not concerned with the path taken by the process and cannot address the rate at which a reaction occurs. Although it does provide information about what can happen during a reaction process, it does not describe the detailed steps of what appears on an atomic or a molecular level. On the other hand,...
11.1K
Observational Learning01:12

Observational Learning

1.1K
Albert Bandura's observational learning, also known as imitation or modeling, occurs when a person observes and imitates another's behavior. It is a quicker process than operant conditioning. A well-known example is the Bobo doll study, where children who saw an adult acting aggressively towards the doll were more likely to act aggressively when left alone, compared to those who observed a nonaggressive adult. Many psychologists view observational learning as a form of latent learning...
1.1K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Structure Is Information: Structural Identifiability Mappings for Machine Learning With Partially Observed Dynamical Systems.

IEEE transactions on cybernetics·2026
Same author

Endocrine and metabolic determinants of cardiometabolic risk in mild autonomous cortisol secretion.

EBioMedicine·2026
Same author

Correction: Combining Artificial Intelligence and Human Support in Mental Health: Digital Intervention With Comparable Effectiveness to Human-Delivered Care.

Journal of medical Internet research·2026
Same author

Solving the 'Goldilocks problem' in dementia clinical trials with multimodal AI.

The journal of prevention of Alzheimer's disease·2025
Same author

AI-guided patient stratification improves outcomes and efficiency in the AMARANTH Alzheimer's Disease clinical trial.

Nature communications·2025
Same author

Whole-genome phenotype prediction with machine learning: open problems in bacterial genomics.

Bioinformatics (Oxford, England)·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Feb 21, 2026

Real-Time Proxy-Control of Re-Parameterized Peripheral Signals using a Close-Loop Interface
11:54

Real-Time Proxy-Control of Re-Parameterized Peripheral Signals using a Close-Loop Interface

Published on: May 8, 2021

5.2K

Learning predictive statistics from temporal sequences: Dynamics and strategies.

Rui Wang1,2, Yuan Shen3,4, Peter Tino4

  • 1Key Laboratory of Mental Health, Institute of Psychology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.

Journal of Vision
|October 4, 2017
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Humans learn complex event structures to predict the future. Faster learning of these structures correlates with choosing the most likely outcome, aiding adaptation to changing environments.

More Related Videos

Temporal Ordering of Dynamic Expression Data from Detailed Spatial Expression Maps
11:52

Temporal Ordering of Dynamic Expression Data from Detailed Spatial Expression Maps

Published on: February 9, 2017

6.6K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Feb 21, 2026

Real-Time Proxy-Control of Re-Parameterized Peripheral Signals using a Close-Loop Interface
11:54

Real-Time Proxy-Control of Re-Parameterized Peripheral Signals using a Close-Loop Interface

Published on: May 8, 2021

5.2K
Temporal Ordering of Dynamic Expression Data from Detailed Spatial Expression Maps
11:52

Temporal Ordering of Dynamic Expression Data from Detailed Spatial Expression Maps

Published on: February 9, 2017

6.6K

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive psychology
  • Neuroscience
  • Machine learning

Background:

  • Human behavior relies on future expectations, often learned by observing event sequences.
  • Environmental structures range from simple frequencies to complex probabilistic combinations.
  • Understanding how humans learn these structures is key to predicting future events.

Purpose of the Study:

  • Investigate the dynamics of human structure learning in response to changing temporal sequences.
  • Examine how individuals adapt to evolving environmental statistics.
  • Explore the relationship between structure learning and decision-making strategies.

Main Methods:

  • Developed probabilistic symbol sequences using a Markov process, varying in complexity from simple frequency to context-based statistics.
  • Tracked human participants' predictions of upcoming symbols in dynamic, changing sequences.
  • Analyzed the relationship between learning speed, structure complexity, and decision strategies (maximizing vs. matching).

Main Results:

  • Demonstrated that individuals adapt to changing environmental statistics by extracting relevant structures for prediction.
  • Showed that faster learning of complex structures is linked to a 'maximizing' decision strategy (selecting the most probable outcome).
  • Found that structure learning is distinct from simply matching sequence statistics.

Conclusions:

  • Humans employ dynamic structure learning to predict future events in variable environments.
  • Individual decision strategies, such as maximizing, are associated with efficient learning of complex environmental structures.
  • Findings suggest multiple pathways for learning behaviorally relevant statistics, enhancing predictive abilities.