Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 27, 2025

Cutoff Value of Phase Angle by Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis at Admission as a Prognostic Factor in Patients with Acute Heart Failure
Published on: June 10, 2025
Predicting 30-Day Mortality for Patients With Acute Heart Failure in the Emergency Department: A Cohort Study
Òscar Miró1, Xavier Rossello1, Víctor Gil1
1From Hospital Clínic, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain; London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom; National Centre for Cardiovascular Research, Hospital Clínico San Carlos, Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, and Universidad Complutense, Madrid, Spain; Hospital General de Alicante, Alicante, Spain; Hospital Universitario Central de Asturias, Oviedo, Spain; and Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Spain.
Background:
Physicians in the emergency department (ED) need additional tools to stratify patients with acute heart failure (AHF) according to risk.
Objective:
To predict mortality using data that are readily available at ED admission.
Design:
Prospective cohort study.
Setting:
34 Spanish EDs.
Participants:
The derivation cohort included 4867 consecutive ED patients admitted during 2009 to 2011. The validation cohort comprised 3229 patients admitted in 2014.
Measurements:
88 candidate risk factors and 30-day mortality.
Results:
Thirteen independent risk factors were identified in the derivation cohort and were combined into an overall score, the MEESSI-AHF (Multiple Estimation of risk based on the Emergency department Spanish Score In patients with AHF) score. This score predicted 30-day mortality with excellent discrimination (c-statistic, 0.836) and calibration (Hosmer-Lemeshow P = 0.99) and provided a steep gradient in 30-day mortality across risk groups (<2% for patients in the 2 lowest risk quintiles and 45% in the highest risk decile). These characteristics were confirmed in the validation cohort (c-statistic, 0.828). Multiple sensitivity analyses did not find important amounts of confounding or bias.
Limitations:
The study was confined to a single country. Participating EDs were not selected randomly. Many patients had missing data. Measurement of some risk factors was subjective.
Conclusion:
This tool has excellent discrimination and calibration and was validated in a different cohort from the one that was used to develop it. Physicians can consider using this tool to inform clinical decisions as further studies are done to determine whether the tool enhances physician decision making and improves patient outcomes.
Primary Funding Source:
Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Spanish Ministry of Health; Fundació La Marató de TV3; and Catalonia Govern.
More Related Videos
04:05Author Spotlight: Unveiling Prognostic Indicators in Heart Failure - The Role of Phase Angle and Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis
Published on: June 30, 2023
06:52Assessment of Dependence in Activities of Daily Living Among Older Patients in an Acute Care Unit
Published on: September 30, 2020
Related Concept Videos
Heart Failure VII: Nursing Interventions
Heart Failure VI: Adjunct Therapies
Heart Failure V: Medical Management
Heart Failure III: Clinical Manifestations
Acute Coronary Syndrome IV: Interprofessional Care
Acute Coronary Syndrome III: Diagnostic Studies