Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Data Validation01:15

Data Validation

2.8K
Method validation is a crucial process in analytical chemistry designed to confirm that a given method consistently produces reliable and high-quality results. This process is essential when a method is applied to different sample matrices or when procedural modifications are made, ensuring that the results meet acceptable standards across various applications.
Key parameters for method validation include:
2.8K
Data Validation01:03

Data Validation

7.1K
Data validation is an essential part of a comprehensive assessment. Validation is confirming or verifying and opening the door to gathering more assessment data as it clarifies vague or unclear data. The process of checking and verifying the collected information is called data validation. The primary purpose of data validation is to ensure data is as free from error, bias, and misinterpretation as possible.
Nursing assessment guides are generally based on holistic models rather than medical...
7.1K
Quality Assurance01:19

Quality Assurance

3.2K
Quality assurance is the overarching term used to describe the activities employed to ensure the proper performance of a system. These activities can be classified into three categories: quality control, quality assessment, and internal corrective measures. Typically, these activities work cyclically: quality control is performed before and during the analysis, while quality assessment occurs during and after the investigation. Internal corrective measures are implemented based on the findings...
3.2K
Reliability and Validity01:29

Reliability and Validity

14.2K
Reliability and validity are two important considerations that must be made with any type of data collection. Reliability refers to the ability to consistently produce a given result. In the context of psychological research, this would mean that any instruments or tools used to collect data do so in consistent, reproducible ways.
14.2K
Uncertainty in Measurement: Accuracy and Precision03:37

Uncertainty in Measurement: Accuracy and Precision

110.3K
Scientists typically make repeated measurements of a quantity to ensure the quality of their findings and to evaluate both the precision and the accuracy of their results. Measurements are said to be precise if they yield very similar results when repeated in the same manner. A measurement is considered accurate if it yields a result that is very close to the true or the accepted value. Precise values agree with each other; accurate values agree with a true value. 
110.3K
Accuracy and Errors in Hypothesis Testing01:13

Accuracy and Errors in Hypothesis Testing

620
Hypothesis testing is a fundamental statistical tool that begins with the assumption that the null hypothesis H0 is true. During this process, two types of errors can occur: Type I and Type II. A Type I error refers to the incorrect rejection of a true null hypothesis, while a Type II error involves the failure to reject a false null hypothesis.
In hypothesis testing, the probability of making a Type I error, denoted as α, is commonly set at 0.05. This significance level indicates a 5%...
620

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

AI in medicine: Hype, hope, and the path forward.

South African medical journal = Suid-Afrikaanse tydskrif vir geneeskunde·2025
Same author

Quantifying the incidence of clinically significant respiratory depression in women with and without obesity class III receiving neuraxial morphine for post-cesarean analgesia: a retrospective cohort study.

International journal of obstetric anesthesia·2021
Same author

Clearly-defined outcomes improve the quality of health outcomes research.

British journal of anaesthesia·2018
Same author

Prospective randomised trial of the Integrated Pulmonary Index™ in low-acuity inpatients.

British journal of anaesthesia·2018
Same author

Does a first-case on-time-start initiative achieve its goal by starting the entire process earlier or by tightening the distribution of start times?

British journal of anaesthesia·2018
Same author

Sex is not gender and why it matters for population health.

British journal of anaesthesia·2018
Same journal

Global environmental and geo-economic impact of conservative versus liberal oxygen strategies in mechanically ventilated critically ill adults: an ecological country-level analysis.

British journal of anaesthesia·2026
Same journal

Postoperative outcomes in older patients living with frailty and multimorbidity in the UK. Response to Br J Anaesth 2026; 136: 776-7.

British journal of anaesthesia·2026
Same journal

South African Paediatric Surgical Outcomes Study-2 (SAPSOS-2): a prospective multi-centre pre-post study evaluating haemoglobin response to oral iron for iron-deficiency anaemia in children undergoing elective noncardiac surgery.

British journal of anaesthesia·2026
Same journal

Intravenous iron administration and management of adverse events: a systematic review and Network for the Advancement of Patient Blood Management, Haemostasis and Thrombosis consensus recommendations.

British journal of anaesthesia·2026
Same journal

Eye-tracking technology applied to regional anaesthesia task performance, safety and skill acquisition: a scoping review.

British journal of anaesthesia·2026
Same journal

Psychological factors associated with postoperative cognitive outcomes in older adults: reconciling adjusted effect estimates with P-value synthesis. Comment on Br J Anaesth 2026; 136: 1482-94.

British journal of anaesthesia·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Feb 21, 2026

Qualitative and Quantitative Validation of Tools with Rating Scales Aimed at Assessing the Quality of University Service-Learning
10:39

Qualitative and Quantitative Validation of Tools with Rating Scales Aimed at Assessing the Quality of University Service-Learning

Published on: August 29, 2025

1.3K

Quality metrics: hard to develop, hard to validate

R E Freundlich1, J M Ehrenfeld1,2

  • 1Departments of Anesthesiology.

British Journal of Anaesthesia
|October 5, 2017
PubMed
Summary

No abstract available in PubMed .

More Related Videos

Using Learning Outcome Measures to assess Doctoral Nursing Education
10:07

Using Learning Outcome Measures to assess Doctoral Nursing Education

Published on: June 21, 2010

19.5K
Development of a Virtual Reality Assessment of Everyday Living Skills
10:32

Development of a Virtual Reality Assessment of Everyday Living Skills

Published on: April 23, 2014

19.4K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Feb 21, 2026

Qualitative and Quantitative Validation of Tools with Rating Scales Aimed at Assessing the Quality of University Service-Learning
10:39

Qualitative and Quantitative Validation of Tools with Rating Scales Aimed at Assessing the Quality of University Service-Learning

Published on: August 29, 2025

1.3K
Using Learning Outcome Measures to assess Doctoral Nursing Education
10:07

Using Learning Outcome Measures to assess Doctoral Nursing Education

Published on: June 21, 2010

19.5K
Development of a Virtual Reality Assessment of Everyday Living Skills
10:32

Development of a Virtual Reality Assessment of Everyday Living Skills

Published on: April 23, 2014

19.4K