Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 21, 2026

05:19
A New Technique for Treating Low-risk Prostate Cancer—Super Active Surveillance
Published on: November 7, 2025
910
Statistical analysis plan for the Urodynamics for Prostate Surgery Trial; Randomised Evaluation of Assessment Methods
Grace J Young1,2, Amanda L Lewis1, J Athene Lane1,2
1Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Canynge Hall, 39 Whatley Road, Bristol, BS8 2PS, UK.
Trials
|October 5, 2017
Summary
This study evaluated if urodynamics (a diagnostic tool) improves outcomes for men with lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) compared to routine care. Results will determine if this diagnostic approach is non-inferior for symptom relief and potentially reduces prostate surgery rates.
Area of Science:
- Urology
- Clinical Trials
- Medical Diagnostics
Background:
- Men with lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) often undergo prostate surgery, which may not address all symptom causes.
- Benign prostatic obstruction (BPO) is a common cause of LUTS, but surgery is ineffective if symptoms stem from other issues.
Purpose of the Study:
- To establish if a care pathway including urodynamics is non-inferior to routine care for men with LUTS regarding symptomatic outcomes.
- To assess if urodynamics can reduce the rate of prostate surgery in men with LUTS.
Main Methods:
- The UPSTREAM trial is a UK-based study randomizing men with LUTS to either urodynamics or routine care.
- Outcomes are measured 18 months post-randomization, with the primary outcome assessed using a non-inferiority margin on the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS).
- Key secondary outcomes include surgery rates, adverse events, flow rate, and urinary and sexual symptoms.
Main Results:
- The trial is designed to detect if urodynamics is non-inferior to routine care for symptomatic outcomes.
- A key secondary outcome is an estimated at least 18% lower surgery rate in the urodynamics arm.
- The study will also assess superiority for surgery rates, adverse events, and various urinary and sexual symptom measures.
Conclusions:
- The a priori statistical analysis plan aims to minimize reporting bias by pre-specifying trial objectives.
- Trial results are anticipated following the recruitment end date, providing evidence for LUTS management strategies.
- The findings will inform clinical decision-making regarding the use of urodynamics in the pathway for men with LUTS.

