Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Dose Size and Dosing Frequency: Determination Methods01:21

Dose Size and Dosing Frequency: Determination Methods

374
Determining the optimal dose size and dosing frequency in pharmacotherapy is crucial for achieving therapeutic effectiveness while minimizing adverse effects. This article explores the methodologies employed in determining these parameters, focusing on their significance and interplay to tailor dosing regimens.Dose Size: Dose size refers to the amount of a drug administered in a single dose. It is determined based on the drug's pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics properties and...
374
Computed Tomography01:10

Computed Tomography

9.1K
Tomography refers to imaging by sections. Computed tomography (CT) is a non-invasive imaging technique that uses computers to analyze several cross-sectional X-rays to reveal minute details about structures in the body.
The technique was invented in the 1970s and is based on the principle that as X-rays pass through the body, they are absorbed or reflected at different levels. In the technique, a patient lies on a motorized platform while a computerized axial tomography (CAT) scanner rotates...
9.1K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

A Rare Case of De Novo Acute Myeloid Leukemia, Featuring a <i>KMT2A</i> (<i>MLL</i>) Amplification.

Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same author

Prospective Comparison of <sup>64</sup>Copper [<sup>64</sup>Cu]SAR-bisPSMA vs <sup>68</sup>Gallium[<sup>68</sup>Ga] PSMA-11 PET/CT for Biochemical Recurrence of Prostate Cancer Following Radical Prostatectomy (Co-PSMA Trial).

European urology·2026
Same author

The Deepwater Horizon Oil Spill: Environmental Fate of the Oil and the Toxicological Effects on Marine Organisms.

Journal of young investigators·2026
Same author

A Mutational Landscape in Acute Myeloid Leukemia: Overview and Prognostic Impacts.

Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)·2025
Same author

Silica substituted carbonate apatite: synthesis and analytical challenges.

Journal of materials chemistry. B·2025
Same author

Radiation vs. trans-oral surgery for treatment de-escalation in HPV-related oropharyngeal cancers: Primary analysis of the ORATOR2 randomized trial.

European journal of cancer (Oxford, England : 1990)·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Feb 21, 2026

Proton Therapy Delivery and Its Clinical Application in Select Solid Tumor Malignancies
08:34

Proton Therapy Delivery and Its Clinical Application in Select Solid Tumor Malignancies

Published on: February 6, 2019

21.2K

Performance Characteristics of an Independent Dose Verification Program for Helical Tomotherapy.

Isaac C F Chang1, Jeff Chen1,2,3, Slav Yartsev1,2,3

  • 1London Regional Cancer Program, London Health Sciences Centre, London, ON, Canada.

Journal of Medical Physics
|October 5, 2017
PubMed
Summary

RadCalc® software shows systematic overestimation in helical tomotherapy dose calculations, particularly in lung cases. This impacts radiotherapy quality assurance accuracy, necessitating algorithm improvements for precise radiation delivery.

Keywords:
Dose verification softwareRadCalc®tomotherapy

More Related Videos

Voluntary Breath-hold Technique for Reducing Heart Dose in Left Breast Radiotherapy
11:38

Voluntary Breath-hold Technique for Reducing Heart Dose in Left Breast Radiotherapy

Published on: July 3, 2014

47.5K
Irradiator Commissioning and Dosimetry for Assessment of LQ &#945; and &#946; Parameters, Radiation Dosing Schema, and in vivo Dose Deposition
06:20

Irradiator Commissioning and Dosimetry for Assessment of LQ α and β Parameters, Radiation Dosing Schema, and in vivo Dose Deposition

Published on: March 11, 2021

7.8K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Feb 21, 2026

Proton Therapy Delivery and Its Clinical Application in Select Solid Tumor Malignancies
08:34

Proton Therapy Delivery and Its Clinical Application in Select Solid Tumor Malignancies

Published on: February 6, 2019

21.2K
Voluntary Breath-hold Technique for Reducing Heart Dose in Left Breast Radiotherapy
11:38

Voluntary Breath-hold Technique for Reducing Heart Dose in Left Breast Radiotherapy

Published on: July 3, 2014

47.5K
Irradiator Commissioning and Dosimetry for Assessment of LQ &#945; and &#946; Parameters, Radiation Dosing Schema, and in vivo Dose Deposition
06:20

Irradiator Commissioning and Dosimetry for Assessment of LQ α and β Parameters, Radiation Dosing Schema, and in vivo Dose Deposition

Published on: March 11, 2021

7.8K

Area of Science:

  • Radiation Oncology
  • Medical Physics
  • Radiotherapy Quality Assurance

Background:

  • Helical tomotherapy, an advanced intensity-modulated radiation therapy, has been clinically used for over two decades.
  • Standard delivery quality assurance for tomotherapy is time-consuming, prompting the need for efficient software solutions.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the accuracy of RadCalc® software's new module for tomotherapy plan dose calculations.
  • To compare RadCalc® dose calculations against the TomoHDA™ treatment planning system for clinical lung and prostate plans.

Main Methods:

  • Dose verification software RadCalc® was beta-tested for tomotherapy dose calculations.
  • Point doses were examined in ten lung and ten prostate clinical plans.
  • TomoHDA™ treatment planning system doses served as the baseline for comparison.

Main Results:

  • RadCalc® overestimated lung doses by an average of 13% and spinal cord/esophagus doses by 10% in lung cases.
  • Prostate plans showed less overestimation, with 6% for prostate, bladder, and rectum.
  • Overestimation was more pronounced in areas of high inhomogeneity, correlating with algorithm limitations.

Conclusions:

  • RadCalc® exhibits systematic dose overestimation in tomotherapy calculations, especially for lung cases.
  • Limitations in the pencil beam algorithm and anatomical representation contribute to inaccuracies.
  • Recommendations for algorithm and anatomical modeling improvements in RadCalc® are provided to enhance radiotherapy accuracy.