Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 21, 2026

Evaluation of Biomaterials for Bladder Augmentation using Cystometric Analyses in Various Rodent Models
Published on: August 9, 2012
Preperitoneal Bladder Augmentation: Feasibility and Results
Dhruva Nath Ghosh1, Sampath Karl2, Sudipta Sen3
1Department of Pediatric Surgery, Christian Medical College, Ludhiana, Punjab, India.
Insights
Preperitoneal bladder augmentation offers a safe and effective method for creating a low-pressure urine reservoir in children. This technique successfully improved bladder capacity and continence, with no intraperitoneal leaks observed.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric Urology
- Reconstructive Surgery
- Bladder Augmentation
Background:
- Bladder augmentation is a key procedure in pediatric reconstructive urology.
- Assessing the feasibility and outcomes of preperitoneal bladder augmentation is crucial.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the safety and efficacy of the preperitoneal bladder augmentation technique.
- To determine the functional outcomes and complication rates of this surgical approach.
Main Methods:
- Thirty-three children with small, inelastic bladders underwent preperitoneal augmentation.
- The procedure involved placing bowel augmentation in the preperitoneal space after bivalving the native bladder.
- A Mitrofanoff port was incorporated when necessary.
Main Results:
- Preperitoneal augmentation yielded compliant, adequate-volume bladders, resolving hydronephrosis and incontinence.
- Vesicoureteral reflux resolved in most cases (24/26 units).
- A significant decrease in serum creatinine was observed in uremic children, and no intraperitoneal leaks occurred.
Conclusions:
- Preperitoneal bladder augmentation is an adequate, safe, and low-pressure reservoir technique.
- The method is effective except in cases of bladder exstrophy or prior abdominal surgery.
- The absence of intraperitoneal leaks is a significant advantage over traditional methods.
Introduction:
Bladder augmentation is an important part of pediatric reconstructive urology. This study was conducted to assess the feasibility and results of our technique of preperitoneal bladder augmentation.
Materials And Methods:
Thirty-three children underwent preperitoneal bladder augmentation for small inelastic bladders who had failed medical management or needed undiversion. The underlying diagnosis included neurogenic bladder, valve bladder, bladder exstrophy, non-neurogenic neurogenic, ectopic ureters, and urogenital sinus. The operative procedure involved placing the entire augmentation in the preperitoneal or subcutaneous space after bivalving the native bladder. The augment segment of the bowel with its pedicle was brought into the preperitoneal space through a small opening in the parietal peritoneum. A Mitrofanoff port was also provided where needed.
Results:
Preperitoneal augmentation provided an adequately compliant, good volume bladder except in children with bladder exstrophy or previous abdominal surgery. There was a good cystometric recovery, with resolution of hydronephrosis and incontinence. Vesicoureteral reflux resolved in 24 of 26 units. In the 13 children who were uremic preoperatively, there was a significant decrease in serum creatinine levels, although 9 children continued to have supra-normal serum creatinine. Surgical complications seen were within expectations. There was no incidence of intraperitoneal leak, which is the main projected benefit of this procedure over the traditional "intraperitoneal" method of augmentation.
Conclusions:
The preperitoneal augmentation provides an adequate, safe, and low-pressure reservoir of urine except in cases of bladder exstrophy and previous abdominal surgery.
Related Concept Videos
Imaging Studies VI: Voiding Cystourethrography and Cystography
Kidney Transplant II: Surgical Procedure
Imaging Studies II: Ultrasonography

