Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Precipitation and Co-precipitation01:17

Precipitation and Co-precipitation

4.4K
Precipitation and coprecipitation methods can be used to separate a mixture of ions in a solution. In qualitative inorganic analysis, ions that form sparingly soluble precipitates with the same reagent are separated based on the differences in solubility products. For example, consider the separation of Cu(II) and Fe(II) ions by precipitation as insoluble sulfides. First, copper(II) sulfide is precipitated by the addition of acidic H2S, where the dissociation of H2S is suppressed. Adding H2S...
4.4K
Pharmaceutical Poisoning: Treatment Strategies01:26

Pharmaceutical Poisoning: Treatment Strategies

52
Treatment strategies for poisoning are a critical aspect of emergency medicine, focusing on preventing the absorption of toxins and enhancing their elimination. When a poisoning incident occurs, the first response is to halt exposure and decontaminate the patient, particularly through gastrointestinal (GI) methods if the poison was ingested.Gastrointestinal Decontamination Techniques:Activated charcoal is the cornerstone of GI decontamination. It works through adsorption, binding the toxin to...
52
Enhanced Elimination of Poison01:26

Enhanced Elimination of Poison

958
Poison can be effectively removed from the gastrointestinal (GI) tract through various decontamination procedures.
Antidotes serve a crucial role in counteracting the effects of poison by inhibiting enzymes responsible for producing harmful drug metabolites. In some cases, these toxic metabolites can be neutralized by endogenous cosubstrates, which are maintained at specific concentrations to prevent interaction with cellular macromolecules and subsequent cell death.
Renal excretion is the...
958
Factors Affecting Solubility04:01

Factors Affecting Solubility

37.5K
Compared with pure water, the solubility of an ionic compound is less in aqueous solutions containing a common ion (one also produced by dissolution of the ionic compound). This is an example of a phenomenon known as the common ion effect, which is a consequence of the law of mass action that may be explained using Le Chȃtelier’s principle. Consider the dissolution of silver iodide:
37.5K
Prevention of Further Absorption of Poison01:14

Prevention of Further Absorption of Poison

1.3K
In cases of acute poisoning, the primary objective is to prevent further absorption of the toxic substance into the body. Immediate interventions using various decontamination techniques targeting the gastrointestinal (GI) tract can achieve this. Decontamination is crucial to prevent poison from entering the systemic circulation, which involves washing affected areas with water and mild soap and removing contaminated clothing. Once external decontamination is done, attention must be turned to...
1.3K
Extraction: Advanced Methods00:56

Extraction: Advanced Methods

1.2K
Metal ions can be separated from one another by complexation with organic ligands–the chelating agent– to form uncharged chelates. Here, the chelating agent must contain hydrophobic groups and behave as a weak acid, losing a proton to bind with the metal. Since most organic ligands used in this process are insoluble or undergo oxidation in the aqueous phase, the chelating agent is initially added to the organic phase and extracted into the aqueous phase. The metal-ligand complex is...
1.2K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Seawater intrusion in the coastal regions: effects on DBPs speciation and risks.

Environmental science and pollution research international·2025
Same author

Probabilistic Health Risk and Loss of Disability-Adjusted Life Years for N-Nitrosodimethylamine in Asian Drinking Water: Assessment and Control Strategies.

Water environment research : a research publication of the Water Environment Federation·2025
Same author

Predicting few disinfection byproducts in the water distribution systems using machine learning models.

Environmental science and pollution research international·2025
Same author

Evaluation and strategy for improving the quality of desalinated water.

Environmental science and pollution research international·2023
Same author

Removal of halides from drinking water: technological achievements in the past ten years and research needs.

Environmental science and pollution research international·2022
Same author

Removal of Pb<sup>2+</sup> from water using the carbon nanotube-g-poly[(sodium methacrylate)-co- 2-(methacryloyloxy)ethyl acetoacetate]: experimental investigation and modeling.

Environmental science and pollution research international·2022

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Feb 21, 2026

Removal of Arsenic Using a Cationic Polymer Gel Impregnated with Iron Hydroxide
08:01

Removal of Arsenic Using a Cationic Polymer Gel Impregnated with Iron Hydroxide

Published on: June 28, 2019

7.9K

Arsenic removal methods for drinking water in the developing countries: technological developments and research

Fayzul Kabir1, Shakhawat Chowdhury2

  • 1Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Water Research Group, King Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals, Dhahran, 31261, Saudi Arabia.

Environmental Science and Pollution Research International
|October 5, 2017
PubMed
Summary

Low-cost arsenic removal technologies are crucial for developing countries facing drinking water contamination. This review identifies accessible solutions to protect public health in affected communities.

Keywords:
Arsenic removal technologiesDeveloping countriesLow-cost technologiesProtecting low-income populationsTreatment cost

More Related Videos

Removal of Trace Elements by Cupric Oxide Nanoparticles from Uranium In Situ Recovery Bleed Water and Its Effect on Cell Viability
09:23

Removal of Trace Elements by Cupric Oxide Nanoparticles from Uranium In Situ Recovery Bleed Water and Its Effect on Cell Viability

Published on: June 21, 2015

10.3K
Construction of a Low-cost Mobile Incubator for Field and Laboratory Use
07:50

Construction of a Low-cost Mobile Incubator for Field and Laboratory Use

Published on: March 19, 2019

14.7K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Feb 21, 2026

Removal of Arsenic Using a Cationic Polymer Gel Impregnated with Iron Hydroxide
08:01

Removal of Arsenic Using a Cationic Polymer Gel Impregnated with Iron Hydroxide

Published on: June 28, 2019

7.9K
Removal of Trace Elements by Cupric Oxide Nanoparticles from Uranium In Situ Recovery Bleed Water and Its Effect on Cell Viability
09:23

Removal of Trace Elements by Cupric Oxide Nanoparticles from Uranium In Situ Recovery Bleed Water and Its Effect on Cell Viability

Published on: June 21, 2015

10.3K
Construction of a Low-cost Mobile Incubator for Field and Laboratory Use
07:50

Construction of a Low-cost Mobile Incubator for Field and Laboratory Use

Published on: March 19, 2019

14.7K

Area of Science:

  • Environmental Science
  • Public Health
  • Water Treatment Technologies

Background:

  • Arsenic contamination in drinking water poses a significant global health risk, especially in developing nations.
  • Existing arsenic removal technologies are often too expensive and complex for small, rural communities in these regions.
  • There is a critical need for affordable and user-friendly arsenic mitigation solutions.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To summarize and review existing arsenic removal technologies.
  • To identify and analyze low-cost, easy-to-use arsenic removal methods suitable for developing countries.
  • To investigate the applications, improvements, and cost-effectiveness of these technologies for low-income populations.

Main Methods:

  • Comprehensive literature review of arsenic removal technologies.
  • Comparative analysis of low-cost arsenic removal methods.
  • Evaluation of technological advantages, disadvantages, and implementation costs.
  • Assessment of applicability in resource-limited settings.

Main Results:

  • Several low-cost arsenic removal technologies show promise for widespread adoption.
  • Key factors influencing technology selection include cost, ease of use, and local applicability.
  • Cost-effectiveness analysis highlights the importance of affordability for low-income communities.

Conclusions:

  • Accessible and affordable arsenic removal technologies are essential for safeguarding public health in developing countries.
  • Further research and development are needed to optimize and scale up low-cost solutions.
  • Implementation strategies must consider the specific socio-economic context of target communities.