Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Reliability and Validity01:29

Reliability and Validity

14.2K
Reliability and validity are two important considerations that must be made with any type of data collection. Reliability refers to the ability to consistently produce a given result. In the context of psychological research, this would mean that any instruments or tools used to collect data do so in consistent, reproducible ways.
14.2K
Self-Report Tests of Personality01:22

Self-Report Tests of Personality

897
Self-report inventories are objective personality assessments that use multiple-choice items or numbered scales, typically ranging from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree). They are often called Likert scales after Rensis Likert. These inventories are widely used due to their ease of administration and cost-effectiveness. One of the most prominent examples is the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory (MMPI), initially developed in the 1940s to assess abnormal personality traits.
897
Measures of Intelligence01:29

Measures of Intelligence

8.6K
Psychologists measure intelligence by using standardized tests that produce a score known as the intelligence quotient or IQ. To understand IQ tests, it's important to recognize the key principles behind their construction: validity, reliability, and standardization.
Validity refers to how well a test measures what it claims to measure. An intelligence test should accurately assess intelligence rather than another characteristic, like anxiety. Criterion validity is one way to evaluate this;...
8.6K
Cattell's 16 Personality Factors01:24

Cattell's 16 Personality Factors

2.7K
Raymond Cattell's trait theory offers a structured framework for understanding personality by distinguishing between two critical traits: surface and source traits. Surface traits are observable patterns of behavior, such as indecisiveness, anxiety, and irrational fears. These traits are less stable, varying across situations and over time. This means that they are less helpful in understanding the deeper aspects of an individual's personality.
In contrast, source traits are the...
2.7K
Five-Factor Theory of Personality01:29

Five-Factor Theory of Personality

2.0K
The five-factor model, often called the Big Five personality traits, is widely accepted in psychology as a comprehensive framework for understanding personality. These five traits — Openness, Conscientiousness, Extraversion, Agreeableness, and Neuroticism — are often remembered using the acronym OCEAN.
Openness reflects creativity, curiosity, and openness to new experiences. Individuals scoring high in openness are imaginative, have a wide range of interests, and are independent...
2.0K
Wechsler's Contribution to Measures of Intelligence01:23

Wechsler's Contribution to Measures of Intelligence

2.2K
David Wechsler, a psychologist who worked with World War I veterans, developed a significant IQ test in 1939 called the Wechsler-Bellevue Intelligence Scale. This test was innovative because it combined several subtests that measured both verbal and nonverbal skills, reflecting Wechsler's belief that intelligence is a global capacity involving purposeful action, rational thinking, and effective interaction with the environment. This test later evolved into the Wechsler Adult Intelligence...
2.2K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Epidemiology and risk factors of stroke in the Americas: a comprehensive narrative literature review.

Lancet regional health. Americas·2026
Same author

Implementation of stroke prevention: a review of challenges and opportunities in the Americas.

Lancet regional health. Americas·2026
Same author

Life's Essential 8: Cardiovascular Health Assessment Among Brazilian University Workers.

Workplace health & safety·2026
Same author

Evidence-informed prioritization of interventions for integrating hypertension management into cardiovascular-kidney-metabolic care in primary health care: HEARTS 2.0 Phase 3.

American journal of hypertension·2026
Same author

Three Low-Dose Antihypertensive Agents in a Single Pill after Intracerebral Hemorrhage.

The New England journal of medicine·2026
Same author

Availability and content analysis of post-stroke rehabilitation guidelines in Latin America: A systematic review.

Journal of stroke and cerebrovascular diseases : the official journal of National Stroke Association·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Feb 21, 2026

Problem-Solving Before Instruction PS-I: A Protocol for Assessment and Intervention in Students with Different Abilities
10:26

Problem-Solving Before Instruction PS-I: A Protocol for Assessment and Intervention in Students with Different Abilities

Published on: September 11, 2021

4.5K

Psychometric properties in instruments evaluation of reliability and validity.

Ana Cláudia de Souza1, Neusa Maria Costa Alexandre1, Edinêis de Brito Guirardello1

  • 1Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Faculdade de Enfermagem, Campinas-SP, Brasil.

Epidemiologia E Servicos De Saude : Revista Do Sistema Unico De Saude Do Brasil
|October 5, 2017
PubMed
Summary

This study explains how to assess the reliability and validity of measurement instruments. Understanding these properties ensures the quality and accuracy of research and clinical health assessments.

More Related Videos

Qualitative and Quantitative Validation of Tools with Rating Scales Aimed at Assessing the Quality of University Service-Learning
10:39

Qualitative and Quantitative Validation of Tools with Rating Scales Aimed at Assessing the Quality of University Service-Learning

Published on: August 29, 2025

1.3K
Author Spotlight: Validation of SICOLE-R for Assessing Cognitive and Reading Skills in Spanish-Speaking Children and Its Role in Personalized Education
09:00

Author Spotlight: Validation of SICOLE-R for Assessing Cognitive and Reading Skills in Spanish-Speaking Children and Its Role in Personalized Education

Published on: August 16, 2024

1.3K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Feb 21, 2026

Problem-Solving Before Instruction PS-I: A Protocol for Assessment and Intervention in Students with Different Abilities
10:26

Problem-Solving Before Instruction PS-I: A Protocol for Assessment and Intervention in Students with Different Abilities

Published on: September 11, 2021

4.5K
Qualitative and Quantitative Validation of Tools with Rating Scales Aimed at Assessing the Quality of University Service-Learning
10:39

Qualitative and Quantitative Validation of Tools with Rating Scales Aimed at Assessing the Quality of University Service-Learning

Published on: August 29, 2025

1.3K
Author Spotlight: Validation of SICOLE-R for Assessing Cognitive and Reading Skills in Spanish-Speaking Children and Its Role in Personalized Education
09:00

Author Spotlight: Validation of SICOLE-R for Assessing Cognitive and Reading Skills in Spanish-Speaking Children and Its Role in Personalized Education

Published on: August 16, 2024

1.3K

Area of Science:

  • Health Sciences
  • Biostatistics
  • Research Methodology

Background:

  • Measurement instruments are crucial for research, clinical practice, and health assessment.
  • Evaluating instrument quality ensures reliable and valid data collection.
  • Reliability and validity are key measurement properties for instrument quality.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To present and discuss criteria and statistical tests for assessing instrument reliability and validity.
  • To provide examples of reliability and validity assessment methods.
  • To guide researchers in selecting high-quality measurement tools.

Main Methods:

  • Discussion of reliability criteria: stability, internal consistency, and equivalence.
  • Explanation of validity criteria: content, criterion, and construct.
  • Exemplification of statistical tests used in assessing these properties.

Main Results:

  • Reliability assessment focuses on consistency of results over time and space.
  • Validity assessment ensures instruments measure intended concepts accurately.
  • Both reliability and validity are essential for robust scientific evidence.

Conclusions:

  • Assessing measurement properties supports the selection of dependable instruments.
  • High-quality instruments are fundamental for ensuring the integrity of study results.
  • This evaluation process enhances the overall quality of health research and assessment.