Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 21, 2026

Observational Study Protocol for Repeated Clinical Examination and Critical Care Ultrasonography Within the Simple Intensive Care Studies
Published on: January 16, 2019
Citrate versus non-citrate anticoagulation in continuous renal replacement therapy: Results following a change in
Samina R Chowdhury1, Tom Lawton2, Aaqid Akram3
1West Yorkshire School of Anaesthesia, Yorkshire and The Humber Deanery, Leeds, UK.
Continuous renal replacement therapy necessitates the use of anticoagulation. The anticoagulant of choice has traditionally been heparin. Emerging evidence has highlighted the deleterious effects of systemic heparin anticoagulation in the critically ill. Regional citrate anticoagulation has been used as an alternative in the setting of continuous renal replacement therapy. Our retrospective before-and-after cohort study aimed to ascertain if regional citrate anticoagulation is associated with any benefit in terms of circuit longevity, rates of complications, blood transfusion requirements and mortality, when introduced to a large general intensive care unit with a case mix of acute medical patients and acute and elective surgical patients. The switch to regional citrate anticoagulation for continuous renal replacement therapy in our intensive care unit has been associated with a dramatically longer circuit life, with major implications for cost savings in terms of reduced nursing workload. We hope to look at fiscal aspects of the change in protocol in greater depth.
Continuous renal replacement therapy necessitates the use of anticoagulation. The anticoagulant of choice has traditionally been heparin. Emerging evidence has highlighted the deleterious effects of systemic heparin anticoagulation in the critically ill. Regional citrate anticoagulation has been used as an alternative in the setting of continuous renal replacement therapy. Our retrospective before-and-after cohort study aimed to ascertain if regional citrate anticoagulation is associated with any benefit in terms of circuit longevity, rates of complications, blood transfusion requirements and mortality, when introduced to a large general intensive care unit with a case mix of acute medical patients and acute and elective surgical patients. The switch to regional citrate anticoagulation for continuous renal replacement therapy in our intensive care unit has been associated with a dramatically longer circuit life, with major implications for cost savings in terms of reduced nursing workload. We hope to look at fiscal aspects of the change in protocol in greater depth.
More Related Videos
08:44Continuous IV Infusion is the Choice Treatment Route for Arginine-vasopressin Receptor Blocker Conivaptan in Mice to Study Stroke-evoked Brain Edema
Published on: September 1, 2016
09:02A Large Animal Model for Acute Kidney Injury by Temporary Bilateral Renal Artery Occlusion
Published on: February 2, 2021
Related Concept Videos
Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy
Extracorporeal Removal of Drugs: Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy
Acute Kidney Injury V: Interprofessional Care
Cardiac Catheterization I: Pre-Procedure Overview
Acute Kidney Injury IV: Diagnostic Studies and Prevention
Venous Thrombosis III: Interprofessional Care