Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 21, 2026

DIPLOMA Approach for Standardized Pathology Assessment of Distal Pancreatectomy Specimens
Published on: February 1, 2020
Pancreatic adenocarcinoma: A simple CT score for predicting margin-positive resection in patients with resectable
Christophe Cassinotto1, Anthony Dohan2, George Zogopoulos3
1Department of Radiology, Royal Victoria Hospital, McGill University Health Center, Montreal, Canada; Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Hôpital Haut-Lévêque, University Hospital of Bordeaux, Pessac, France.
Background:
Negative-margin status is a prognostic indicator for long-term survival following curative intent resection for pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Patients at increased risk for positive-margin resections may benefit from neoadjuvant chemotherapy prior to resection.
Methods:
We retrospectively analyzed preoperative computed-tomography (CT) scans in 108 consecutive patients that underwent curative intent resection for a resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma from 2009 to 2016 in two academic hospitals. Two radiologists independently staged the tumor, including tumor location, size, and tumor-to-superior mesenteric/portal vein (SMV/PV) contact. Uni and multivariate analysis were performed to identify independent predictors of an R1 resection.
Results:
Twenty-nine patients had an R1 resection (26.9%). Tumor size, location, and presence of tumor-to-SMV/PV contact were significantly associated with an R1 resection. In multivariate analysis, the independent parameters associated with resection status were: tumor size (R2=9.7), and tumor location (neck R2=6.6; pancreaticoduodenal interface R2=4.4; uncinate process R2=4.1), but not tumor-to-SMV/PV contact (R2=0.1, p=0.7). A simple CT score was built based on tumor size and location. Patients with an R0 resectability score ≥3, i.e. patients with tumor size ≥30mm (except when tumor location is at the pancreatico-duodenal interface) or patients with tumor size ≥20mm AND tumor located in the uncinate process or neck, were at high-risk of an R1 resection (AUC, 0.82; sensitivity, 79%; specificity, 76%). This score also showed good diagnostic performances for predicting an R1 resection involving the medial resection margin only (AUC, 0.85).
Conclusions:
A simple score based on tumor location and size can accurately predict patients at high-risk of an R1 resection.

