Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 21, 2026

Author Spotlight: Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Combined with Movement Observation in Cerebral Palsy
Published on: August 9, 2024
Best seating condition in children with spastic cerebral palsy: One type does not fit all
Mattana Angsupaisal1, Linze-Jaap Dijkstra1, Sacha la Bastide-van Gemert2
1University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Department of Paediatrics - Division of Developmental Neurology, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Insights
Forward-tilting seat surfaces improve reaching in children with unilateral spastic cerebral palsy (CP) but worsen it in those with bilateral spastic CP (BS-CP). Head stability was unaffected by seating adjustments in children with CP.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric Rehabilitation
- Biomechanics
- Neurology
Background:
- The impact of seating modifications on motor function in children with spastic cerebral palsy (CP) remains a subject of debate.
- Understanding optimal seating is crucial for enhancing functional abilities in children with CP.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the effects of forward-tilted seating and foot support on head stability and reaching kinematics in children with CP.
- To differentiate the impact of these seating interventions between unilateral spastic CP (US-CP) and bilateral spastic CP (BS-CP).
Main Methods:
- Nineteen children (6-12 years) with Gross Motor Function Classification System levels I-III participated.
- Kinematic data of head sway and reaching were collected in four seating conditions: horizontal and 15° forward-tilted, with and without foot support.
- Participants included ten with US-CP and nine with BS-CP.
Main Results:
- Seating conditions did not influence head stability during reaching.
- Forward-tilting positively impacted reaching parameters (movement unit proportion and size) in children with US-CP.
- Conversely, forward-tilting negatively affected reaching in children with BS-CP, while a horizontal seat was more beneficial.
Conclusions:
- A 15° forward-tilted seat with foot support does not enhance head stability in children with CP.
- Forward-tilting seating benefits reaching in US-CP but impairs it in BS-CP, independent of foot support.
- These findings suggest tailored seating strategies are necessary for different CP subtypes.
Background:
The effect of forward-tilting of the seat surface and foot-support in children with spastic cerebral palsy (CP) is debated.
Aim:
To assess the effect of forward-tilting of the seat surface and foot-support in children with CP on kinematic head stability and reaching.
Methods:
Nineteen children functioning at Gross Motor Function Classification System levels I-III participated [range 6-12y; ten unilateral spastic CP (US-CP) and nine bilateral spastic CP (BS-CP)]. Kinematic data were recorded of head sway and reaching with the dominant arm in four sitting conditions: a horizontal and a 15° forward (FW) tilted seat surface, each with and without foot-support.
Results:
Seating condition did not affect head stability during reaching, but did affect kinematic reaching quality. The major reaching parameters, i.e., the proportion of reaches with one movement unit (MU) and the size of the transport MU, were not affected by foot-support. Forward-tilting had a positive effect on these parameters in children with US-CP, whereas the horizontal condition had this effect in children with BS-CP.
Implications:
A 15° forward-tilted seating and foot-support do not affect head stability. Reaching in children with US-CP profits from forward-tilting; in children with BS-CP forward-tilting worsens reaching - effects that are independent of foot-support.
More Related Videos
05:04Enhancing the Development and Growth of Infant Cerebral Palsy Rats Using Selective Spinal Manipulations
Published on: February 2, 2024
08:26Event-related Potentials During Target-response Tasks to Study Cognitive Processes of Upper Limb Use in Children with Unilateral Cerebral Palsy
Published on: January 11, 2016