Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 21, 2026
Fixed Volume or Fixed Pressure: A Murine Model of Hemorrhagic Shock
Published on: June 6, 2011
Haemodynamic response to crystalloids or colloids in shock: an exploratory subgroup analysis of a randomised
Nicholas Heming1,2, Souheil Elatrous3, Samir Jaber4
1General Intensive Care Unit, Raymond Poincaré Hospital, Garches, France.
Objective:
To compare the haemodynamic effect of crystalloids and colloids during acute severe hypovolaemic shock.
Design:
Exploratory subgroup analysis of a multicentre randomised controlled trial (Colloids Versus Crystalloids for the Resuscitation of the Critically Ill, CRISTAL, ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00318942).
Setting:
CRISTAL was conducted in intensive care units in Europe, North Africa and Canada.
Participants:
Current analysis included all patients who had a pulmonary artery catheter in place at randomisation. 220 patients (117 received crystalloids vs 103 colloids) underwent pulmonary artery catheterisation.
Intervention:
Crystalloids versus colloids for fluid resuscitation in hypovolaemic shock.
Outcome Measures:
Haemodynamic data were collected at the time of randomisation and subsequently on days 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 and 7.
Results:
Median cumulative volume of fluid administered during the first 7 days was higher in the crystalloids group than in the colloids group (3500 (2000-6000) vs 2500 (1000-4000) mL, p=0.01). Patients in the colloids arm exhibited a lower heart rate over time compared with those allocated to the crystalloids arm (p=0.014). There was no significant difference in Cardiac Index (p=0.053), mean blood pressure (p=0.4), arterial lactates (p=0.9) or global Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score (p=0.3) over time between arms.
Conclusions:
During acute severe hypovolaemic shock, patients monitored by a pulmonary artery catheter achieved broadly similar haemodynamic outcomes, using lower volumes of colloids than crystalloids. The heart rate was lower in the colloids arm.
