Randomized phase II trial comparing axitinib with the combination of axitinib and lomustine in patients with

J Duerinck1, S Du Four2, F Bouttens3

  • 1Department of Neurosurgery, Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel, Laarbeeklaan 101, 1090, Brussels, Belgium. johnny.duerinck@uzbrussel.be.

Insights

Axitinib monotherapy showed improved response rates and progression-free survival in recurrent glioblastoma patients compared to historical data. Combining axitinib with lomustine did not yield better outcomes and increased toxicity.

Area of Science:

  • Oncology
  • Clinical Pharmacology
  • Neuro-oncology

Background:

  • Recurrent glioblastoma (rGB) presents a significant therapeutic challenge.
  • Axitinib, a tyrosine kinase inhibitor targeting VEGF receptors, has shown prior anti-tumor activity in rGB.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate axitinib monotherapy versus axitinib plus lomustine in patients with rGB.
  • To determine the primary endpoint of 6-month progression-free survival (6mPFS).

Main Methods:

  • A non-comparative randomized phase II clinical trial.
  • Patients received either axitinib monotherapy (AXI) or axitinib plus lomustine (AXILOM).
  • Cross-over to axitinib was permitted upon progression in the AXILOM arm.

Main Results:

  • 6mPFS was 26% for AXI vs. 17% for AXILOM.
  • Best Overall Response Rate (BORR) was 28% for AXI vs. 38% for AXILOM.
  • AXILOM arm showed higher rates of grade 3/4 neutropenia (21%) and thrombocytopenia (29%).

Conclusions:

  • Axitinib monotherapy demonstrated improved response rates and progression-free survival in rGB patients compared to historical controls.
  • Upfront combination of axitinib with lomustine did not improve outcomes and was associated with increased toxicity.
  • MGMT-promoter hypermethylation and baseline steroid treatment were significant prognostic factors for PFS and OS.