Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

When to choose dynamic vs. static social network analysis.

Damien R Farine1,2,3

  • 1Department of Collective Behaviour, Max Planck Institute for Ornithology, Konstanz, Germany.

The Journal of Animal Ecology
|October 11, 2017
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Social implications of human food subsidies on wildlife populations.

Proceedings. Biological sciences·2026
Same author

Habitat selection during dispersal reduces the energetic cost of transport when making large displacements.

Proceedings. Biological sciences·2025
Same author

Physiological synchrony among human fishers during collective hunting with wild dolphins.

Biology letters·2025
Same author

COVID-19 lockdown effects on the foraging strategies of a facultative scavenger.

Biology letters·2025
Same author

Social and spatial drivers of the multitiered structure of zebra finch social networks.

Proceedings. Biological sciences·2025
Same author

Non-breeding social behaviour as an investment in reducing future territoriality costs.

Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society·2025

Dynamic social network analysis offers valuable insights into animal behavior, especially when tracking changes over time or studying disease spread. This guide helps researchers choose between dynamic and static network approaches for better understanding animal sociality.

Area of Science:

  • Animal behavior
  • Ecology
  • Network science

Background:

  • Increasing interest in dynamic social networks for studying animal sociality.
  • Lack of clear guidance on when and how to use dynamic social network analysis.
  • Need for a framework to choose between dynamic and static network approaches.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To provide guidance on selecting dynamic versus static social network analysis.
  • To advise on choosing the appropriate temporal scale for dynamic network analysis.
  • To outline scenarios where dynamic networks offer significant advantages.

Main Methods:

  • Discussion of motivations for employing dynamic animal social networks.
  • Comparative analysis of dynamic versus static network approaches.
Keywords:
disease transmissiongroup livinginformation transmissionsocial network analysissocial organisation

Related Experiment Videos

  • Consideration of temporal scale, predictability, and data availability in network selection.

    • Main Results:

    • Dynamic networks are crucial for accurate estimation of spreading rates (e.g., disease, information).
    • Dynamic networks capture impacts of predictable temporal changes (e.g., diel, seasonal cycles).
    • Dynamic networks are beneficial for nonlinear transmission probabilities and dense interaction scenarios.

    Conclusions:

    • The choice between static and dynamic social network analysis requires careful consideration of research questions and data.
    • This paper provides a framework for evaluating the relative importance of static versus dynamic network approaches.
    • Adopting the appropriate network analysis method enhances the understanding of animal social dynamics.