Well differentiated and small cell neuroendocrine carcinomas of the lung. Two related but distinct clinicopathologic...

Twenty-two resected pulmonary well differentiated neuroendocrine carcinomas (WDNC) were re-evaluated histologically as were 28 resected intermediate-small cell neuroendocrine carcinomas (IC-SCNC). WDNC were distinguishable from IC-SCNC by their consistently recognizable organoid architecture, and by the absence or limited extent of necrosis. Furthermore, WDNC could be subclassified into 3 subsets based upon the degrees of pleomorphism, local and vascular invasion, and stromal fibrosis, the mitotic count, and the extent of tumor necrosis. Whereas all those parameters were important in discriminating between WDNC and IC-SCNC, the quality of the organoid architecture, and the extent and pattern of necrosis emerged as the most significant. WDNC with the more aggressive histologic features (subset III) had, as a group, a distinctly worse clinical course that those displaying blander features (subsets I and II). Nevertheless, even subset III of WDNC had, as a group, a longer survival than similarly treated Stages I and II IC-SCNC. We conclude that the histologic spectrum of WDNC is broader than generally recognized. Moreover, 3 subsets of WDNC are definable based on conventional histologic criteria provided sufficient, well preserved samples are examined. Even the most aggressive subset of WDNC can be thus histologically discriminated from IC-SCNC, and, given comparable stages, has a better prognosis than the latter.