Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 21, 2026

Using Fiberless, Wearable fNIRS to Monitor Brain Activity in Real-world Cognitive Tasks
Published on: December 2, 2015
fNIRS response during walking - Artefact or cortical activity? A systematic review
R Vitorio1, S Stuart2, L Rochester2
1Institute of Neuroscience/Newcastle University Institute of Ageing, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom; Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), Instituto de Biociências, Campus Rio Claro, Brazil.
Functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) walking studies face challenges due to varied designs and signal processing. This review offers recommendations for robust methodologies and analysis techniques in neuroimaging research.
Area of Science:
- Neuroscience
- Biomedical Engineering
- Rehabilitation Science
Background:
- Functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) is increasingly used to study brain activity during walking.
- Existing fNIRS walking studies exhibit significant variability in design and data analysis.
- This variability complicates the interpretation and comparison of findings across different research groups.
Purpose of the Study:
- To systematically review fNIRS walking study designs in young adults, older adults, and individuals with Parkinson's disease (PD).
- To examine signal processing techniques for reducing artifacts and physiological noise in fNIRS data.
- To provide evidence-based recommendations for optimizing fNIRS walking study methodologies and analysis.
Main Methods:
- A systematic electronic literature search was conducted using keywords related to the measurement technique, cohort, and walking task.
- Thirty-one studies meeting specific inclusion criteria were analyzed.
- Protocols for study design, artifact removal, and noise reduction were evaluated.
Main Results:
- Significant heterogeneity was observed in fNIRS walking study protocols and signal processing methods.
- Inconsistencies in fNIRS signals were noted across different conditions, including rest vs. walking, walking speed, and task complexity.
- Variations in methodologies contribute to inconsistencies in study findings.
Conclusions:
- Conducting fNIRS studies during walking presents substantial technical and methodological challenges.
- Recommendations are provided for developing robust methodologies and appropriate signal processing techniques.
- A theoretical framework considering the physiology of hemodynamic responses is suggested for future fNIRS walking research.
More Related Videos
05:25Author Spotlight: Assessing Brain Activity in Robotic-Assisted Lower Limb Rehabilitation Using fNIRS
Published on: June 7, 2024
06:18Qualitative and Comparative Cortical Activity Data Analyses from a Functional Near-Infrared Spectroscopy Experiment Applying Block Design
Published on: December 3, 2020