Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 21, 2026

A Cell Culture Model for Producing High Titer Hepatitis E Virus Stocks
Published on: June 26, 2020
The effect of a hepatitis pay-for-performance program on outcomes of patients undergoing antiviral therapy
Tsung-Tai Chen1, Ya-Seng Arthur Hsueh2, Chun-Hsiung Ko1
1Department of Public Health, College of Medicine, Fu-Jen Catholic University, New Taipei City, Taiwan.
Insights
A participatory pay-for-performance (P4P) program in Taiwan did not reduce hospital admissions for severe hepatitis B or C patients needing antiviral therapy. Further research is needed to understand how P4P can improve patient-centered care.
Area of Science:
- Hepatology
- Health Services Research
- Public Health
Background:
- Investigating the impact of a participatory pay-for-performance (P4P) program in Taiwan.
- Focusing on patients with severe hepatitis B or C.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the effectiveness of a participatory P4P program on health outcomes.
- Assessing the program's influence on hospital admissions and disease progression.
Main Methods:
- Utilized 4-year panel data from Taiwan's National Health Insurance Administration (NHIA).
- Employed caliper matching for one-to-one patient group comparison (2010-2013).
- Applied Cox proportional-hazards regression models to analyze patient outcomes.
Main Results:
- The P4P group did not show a statistically significant lower risk of hospital admission for severe hepatitis patients requiring antiviral therapy (HR = 0.44, P = 0.05).
- A reduced risk of developing liver cirrhosis was observed in the P4P group, but this finding was not statistically significant (HR = 0.92, P = 0.77).
Conclusions:
- Participatory P4P did not lead to decreased hospital admissions for hepatitis patients needing antiviral therapy.
- The study discusses potential mechanisms for participatory P4P to enhance patient-centered care and improve health outcomes.
Background:
To examine the effect of a participatory pay-for-performance (P4P) program in Taiwan on health outcomes for patients with severe hepatitis B or C.
Methods:
This study adopted 4-year panel data from the databases of the National Health Insurance Administration (NHIA) in Taiwan. Using the caliper matching method to match patients in the P4P (experimental) group with those in the potential comparison group on a one-to-one basis for the year 2010, we tracked patients up to the year 2013 and employed Cox proportional-hazards regression models to evaluate the effect on patient outcomes.
Results:
The P4P group did not have a lower risk (HR = 0.44, P = 0.05) of hospital admission for severe hepatitis patients (i.e. need antiviral therapy). The risk of developing liver cirrhosis was also lower, but the reduction was not statistically significant (HR = 0.92, P = 0.77).
Conclusions:
This study found that participatory-type P4P has not resulted in reduced hospital admission of hepatitis B or C patients who need antiviral therapy. The means by which the participatory P4P program could strengthen patient-centered care to achieve better patient health outcomes is discussed in detail.
Related Concept Videos
Effect of Hepatic Disease on Pharmacokinetics: Pathophysiologic Assessment and Liver Function Test
Effect of Hepatic Disease on Pharmacokinetics: Dose Adjustments Due to Hepatic Impairment
Effect of Hepatic Disease on Pharmacokinetics: Drug Dosing and Hepatic Blood Flow
Effect of Hepatic Disease on Pharmacokinetics: Active Drug, Metabolite and Fraction of Metabolized Drug
Hepatic Drug Excretion: Influencing Factors
Chronic Pancreatitis II: Collaborative Care
Assessment:

