Antiphospholipid antibody-induced cellular responses depend on epitope specificity : implications for treatment of...

Essentials Antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL) are heterogeneous and induce different cellular responses. We analyzed signaling events induced by different monoclonal and patient aPL in monocytes. Two major signaling pathways involving either NADPH-oxidase or LRP8 were identified. Our data suggest that these two pathways mediate the majority of aPL effects on monocytes.

Background Antiphospholipid antibodies (aPLs) contribute to the pathogenesis of the antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) by induction of an inflammatory and procoagulant state in different cell types, and several signaling pathways have been described. Objectives To investigate whether signaling depends on the epitope specificity of aPLs. Methods Cellular effects of three human monoclonal aPLs with distinctly different epitope specificities were analyzed in vitro. Expression of tumor necrosis factor-α mRNA by mouse and human monocytes was the major readout. Analysis included cells from genetically modified mice, and the use of specific inhibitors in human monocytes. Data were validated with IgG isolated from 20 APS patients. Results Cofactor-independent anticardiolipin aPLs activated monocytes by induction of endosomal NADPH oxidase. Activation could be blocked by hydroxychloroquine (HCQ). Anti-β₂ -glycoprotein I aPL activated monocytes by interacting with LDL receptor-related protein 8 (LRP8). This could be blocked by rapamycin. Analysis of 20 APS patients' IgG showed that all IgG fractions activated the same two pathways as the monoclonal aPL, depending on their epitope patterns as determined by ELISA. Monocyte activation by APS IgG could be blocked completely by HCQ and/or rapamycin, suggesting that in most, if not all, APS patients there is no other relevant signaling pathway. Conclusions aPLs activate two major proinflammatory signal transduction pathways, depending on their epitope specificity. HCQ and rapamycin, either alone or in combination, completely suppress signaling by APS IgG. These observations may provide a rationale for specific treatment of APS patients according to their aPL profile.