Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 20, 2026
X-ray Dose Reduction through Adaptive Exposure in Fluoroscopic Imaging
Published on: September 11, 2011
Dose reduction for fluoroscopically guided injections: phantom simulation and patient procedures
C Y Chang1, F J Simeone2, M C DeLorenzo3
1Division of Musculoskeletal Imaging and Intervention, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, 55 Fruit Street Yawkey 6E, Boston, MA, 02114, USA. cychang@mgh.harvard.edu.
Objective:
To demonstrate fluoroscopy dose reduction through both simulated injections on a phantom and patient injections.
Materials And Methods:
Our study was IRB-approved and HIPAA-compliant. Simulation on a phantom was used to estimate effective dose, entrance dose, and organ doses for hip joint injections without and with dose minimization technique (DMT). Additionally, 1,094 joint, bursae, and tendon sheath injections performed by three operators in the same fluoroscopy suite were evaluated both before and after application of DMT. Fluoroscopy time (FT), dose, and dose area product (DAP) of injections were compared using unpaired t-tests with P > 0.05 considered statistically significant.
Results:
For the phantom simulation comparing injections without DMT and with DMT, the total DAP was 191.7 vs 18.7 μGy·m2, and the entrance dose was 10.2 vs 3.6 mGy, respectively. For both men and women, DMT reduces effective dose and organ doses. For all injections, the FT (0.7 to 0.2 min), dose (5.6 to 1.9 mGy), and DAP (56.9 to 19.1 μGy·m2) for all three operators decreased with DMT and remained statistically significant when stratified by the two most common injections, glenohumeral and hip joint injections (P < 0.05).
Conclusions:
FT, effective dose, entrance dose, and DAP can be reduced with the use of simple easy-to-learn techniques, which will benefit both the patient and the radiologist.
