PARP inhibitors: Clinical utility and possibilities of overcoming resistance

Benjamin G Bitler1, Zachary L Watson1, Lindsay J Wheeler2

  • 1Division of Reproductive Sciences, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The University of Colorado, Aurora, CO, United States.

Gynecologic Oncology
|October 18, 2017
PubMed

Insights

Poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors are effective treatments for ovarian cancer with homologous recombination deficiencies. This review explores their use, resistance, and management strategies for recurrent ovarian cancer.

Area of Science:

  • Oncology
  • Molecular Biology
  • Genetics

Background:

  • PARP inhibitors represent a significant advancement in ovarian cancer treatment.
  • Homologous recombination (HR) DNA repair pathway deficiencies, including BRCA1/2 mutations, are present in nearly half of ovarian cancers.
  • Limited options exist for recurrent ovarian cancer, driving the development of novel therapies targeting DNA repair defects.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review the clinical applications, toxicities, and resistance mechanisms of PARP inhibitors in ovarian cancer.
  • To explore novel biomarkers for predicting PARP inhibitor response.
  • To discuss strategies for managing PARP inhibitor-resistant ovarian cancer.

Main Methods:

  • Review of existing literature on PARP inhibitors in ovarian cancer.
  • Analysis of clinical trial data and FDA-approved indications.
  • Examination of mechanisms of resistance and potential therapeutic strategies.

Main Results:

  • PARP inhibitors are approved for recurrent ovarian cancer with HR deficiencies and show benefit in patients without HR deficiencies.
  • Three PARP inhibitors are FDA-approved, with two more in late-stage trials.
  • Acquired resistance to PARP inhibitors is a significant clinical challenge.

Conclusions:

  • PARP inhibitors have transformed ovarian cancer care, particularly for HR-deficient tumors.
  • Understanding and overcoming resistance are crucial for optimizing long-term patient outcomes.
  • Further research into biomarkers and combination therapies is needed to manage resistant disease effectively.

Related Concept Videos

Treatment Resistant Cancers02:56

Treatment Resistant Cancers

Cancer is the second leading cause of death in the United States. A cancer cell is genetically unstable and hence can mutate faster. They can also modify their microenvironment and escape immune surveillance. The difficulties in treating cancer are further compounded by the emergence of rapid resistance to anticancer drugs. The most common ways to attain resistance in cancer cells include alteration in drug transport and metabolism, modification of drug target, elevated DNA damage response, or...
3.8K
Targeted Cancer Therapies02:57

Targeted Cancer Therapies

The targeted cancer therapies, also known as “molecular targeted therapies,” take advantage of the molecular and genetic differences between the cancer cells and the normal cells. It needs a thorough understanding of the cancer cells to develop drugs that can target specific molecular aspects that drive the growth, progression, and spread of cancer cells without affecting the growth and survival of other normal cells in the body.
There are several types of targeted therapies against...
9.0K
Combination Therapies and Personalized Medicine02:50

Combination Therapies and Personalized Medicine

Combining two or more treatment methods increases the life span of cancer patients while reducing damage to vital organs or tissue from the overuse of a single treatment. Combination therapy also targets different cancer-inducing pathways, thus reducing the chances of developing resistance to treatment.
The combination of the drug acetazolamide and sulforaphane is a good example of combination therapy to treat cancer. The cells in the interior of a large tumor often die due to the hypoxic and...
6.2K
Long-patch Base Excision Repair01:02

Long-patch Base Excision Repair

Since the discovery of the two BER pathways, there has been a debate about how a cell chooses one pathway over the other and the factors determining this selection. Numerous in vitro experiments have pointed out multiple determinants for the sub-pathway selection. These are:
8.1K