Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 16, 2026

Establishment and Evaluation of a Risk Prediction Model for Pathological Escalation of Gastric Low-Grade Intraepithelial Neoplasia
Published on: February 16, 2024
Factors Associated with Surveillance Adenoma and Sessile Serrated Polyp Detection Rates.
Jennifer K Maratt1,2, Joseph Dickens3, Philip S Schoenfeld4
1Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Michigan Medicine, 3912 Taubman Center, SPC 5362, 1500 East Medical Center Drive, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109-5362, USA. jkrai@med.umich.edu.
Surveillance colonoscopy adenoma detection rate (ADR) was 49% and sessile serrated polyp detection rate (SSPDR) was 8%. Factors like age, gender, BMI, and withdrawal time influenced ADR, while race and diabetes affected SSPDR.
Area of Science:
- Gastroenterology
- Endoscopy
- Cancer Prevention
Background:
- Adenoma detection rate (ADR) and sessile serrated polyp detection rate (SSPDR) are crucial metrics in colonoscopy surveillance.
- Limited data exists on these detection rates and their predictors during surveillance colonoscopies.
Purpose of the Study:
- To determine the ADR and SSPDR in surveillance colonoscopies.
- To identify patient, endoscopist, and procedural factors associated with these detection rates.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective review of 2416 surveillance colonoscopies performed at an academic center.
- Exclusion of cases with recent prior colonoscopy, incomplete exams, or other indications.
- Multivariable logistic regression analysis to identify predictors of ADR and SSPDR.
Main Results:
- Surveillance ADR was 49% and SSPDR was 8%.
- Higher ADR was associated with increased age, male gender, BMI, withdrawal time, and higher endoscopist screening ADR. More years since training correlated with lower ADR.
- Higher SSPDR was linked to family history of CRC and higher endoscopist screening ADR. African-American race and diabetes were associated with lower SSPDR.
Conclusions:
- Surveillance colonoscopies detect adenomas in nearly half of patients and SSPs in about 8%.
- Factors including BMI, endoscopist's screening ADR, and years since training impact ADR, while race and diabetes inversely affect SSPDR.
- Further research is required before incorporating surveillance ADR and SSPDR into quality metrics.
More Related Videos
06:46Competing-Risk Nomogram for Predicting Cancer-Specific Survival in Multiple Primary Colorectal Cancer Patients after Surgery
Published on: September 27, 2024
04:09The Pocket-Creation Procedure of Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection for Large Rectal Laterally Spreading Tumors
Published on: February 13, 2026