Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Genetic Drift03:33

Genetic Drift

44.3K
Natural selection—probably the most well-known evolutionary mechanism—increases the prevalence of traits that enhance survival and reproduction. However, evolution does not merely propagate favorable traits, nor does it always benefit populations.
44.3K
Mutation, Gene Flow, and Genetic Drift01:09

Mutation, Gene Flow, and Genetic Drift

64.8K
In a population that is not at Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium, the frequency of alleles changes over time. Therefore, any deviations from the five conditions of Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium can alter the genetic variation of a given population. Conditions that change the genetic variability of a population include mutations, natural selection, non-random mating, gene flow, and genetic drift (small population size).
64.8K
Conservation of Small Populations02:04

Conservation of Small Populations

17.5K
Small population sizes put a species at extreme risk of extinction due to a lack of variation, and a consequent decrease in adaptability. This weakens the chances of survival under pressures such as climate change, competition from other species, or new diseases. Large populations are more likely to survive pressures such as these, as such populations are more likely to harbor individuals that have genetic variants that are adaptive under new stresses. Small populations are much less...
17.5K
Conservation of Declining Populations02:07

Conservation of Declining Populations

13.5K
Conservation of declining population focuses on ways of detecting, diagnosing, and halting a population decline. The approach uses methods to prevent populations from going extinct.
13.5K
Gene Flow02:39

Gene Flow

38.2K
Gene flow is the transfer of genes among populations, resulting from either the dispersal of gametes or from the migration of individuals.
38.2K
Limits to Natural Selection01:38

Limits to Natural Selection

35.4K
Organisms that are well-adapted to their environment are more likely to survive and reproduce. However, natural selection does not lead to perfectly adapted organisms. Several factors constrain natural selection.
35.4K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

What Is Redundancy?

Entropy (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same author

Neuroevolution gives rise to more focused information transfer compared to backpropagation in recurrent neural networks.

Neural computing & applications·2025
Same author

How Brains Perceive the World.

Artificial life·2024
Same author

Mechanism of Duration Perception in Artificial Brains Suggests New Model of Attentional Entrainment.

Neural computation·2024
Same author

A dynamic network model predicts the phenotypes of multicellular clusters from cellular properties.

Current biology : CB·2024
Same author

Multicellular growth as a dynamic network of cells.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2023

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Feb 20, 2026

Following the Dynamics of Structural Variants in Experimentally Evolved Populations
04:52

Following the Dynamics of Structural Variants in Experimentally Evolved Populations

Published on: February 3, 2023

1.4K

Evolution of drift robustness in small populations.

Thomas LaBar1,2,3, Christoph Adami4,5,6,7

  • 1Department of Microbiology & Molecular Genetics, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, 48824, USA.

Nature Communications
|October 19, 2017
PubMed
Summary

Small populations evolve "drift robustness," reducing vulnerability to genetic drift. This occurs because they maintain fitness on robust fitness peaks, not through adaptation.

More Related Videos

Daily Transfers, Archiving Populations, and Measuring Fitness in the Long-Term Evolution Experiment with Escherichia coli
15:00

Daily Transfers, Archiving Populations, and Measuring Fitness in the Long-Term Evolution Experiment with Escherichia coli

Published on: August 18, 2023

4.4K
High-Throughput Live Imaging of Microcolonies to Measure Heterogeneity in Growth and Gene Expression
12:52

High-Throughput Live Imaging of Microcolonies to Measure Heterogeneity in Growth and Gene Expression

Published on: April 18, 2021

5.5K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Feb 20, 2026

Following the Dynamics of Structural Variants in Experimentally Evolved Populations
04:52

Following the Dynamics of Structural Variants in Experimentally Evolved Populations

Published on: February 3, 2023

1.4K
Daily Transfers, Archiving Populations, and Measuring Fitness in the Long-Term Evolution Experiment with Escherichia coli
15:00

Daily Transfers, Archiving Populations, and Measuring Fitness in the Long-Term Evolution Experiment with Escherichia coli

Published on: August 18, 2023

4.4K
High-Throughput Live Imaging of Microcolonies to Measure Heterogeneity in Growth and Gene Expression
12:52

High-Throughput Live Imaging of Microcolonies to Measure Heterogeneity in Growth and Gene Expression

Published on: April 18, 2021

5.5K

Area of Science:

  • Evolutionary biology
  • Population genetics

Background:

  • Mutations typically reduce population fitness (mutational load).
  • Small populations experience weakened selection against slightly deleterious mutations, increasing fitness loss.
  • While populations can evolve mutational robustness, it's unclear if small populations can reduce susceptibility to drift-related fitness declines.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate whether small populations evolve reduced vulnerability to genetic drift (drift robustness).
  • To determine the mechanisms and adaptive significance of drift robustness.

Main Methods:

  • Mathematical modeling
  • Digital experimental evolution

Main Results:

  • Small populations evolve drift robustness, decreasing their vulnerability to drift.
  • Genotypes from small populations have fewer small-effect deleterious mutations than those from large populations.
  • Drift robustness arises not from adaptation but from small populations maintaining fitness on robust fitness peaks.

Conclusions:

  • Small populations are inherently drift-robust.
  • This robustness is a consequence of evolutionary constraints in small populations.
  • Findings impact understanding of genome evolution in species with small effective population sizes.