Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 20, 2026

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
Published on: January 8, 2020
Concentration of Potentially Preventable Spending Among High-Cost Medicare Subpopulations: An Observational Study
Jose F Figueroa1, Karen E Joynt Maddox1, Nancy Beaulieu1
1From Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Brigham and Women's Hospital, and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, and Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri.
Background:
Little is known about whether potentially preventable spending is concentrated among a subset of high-cost Medicare beneficiaries.
Objective:
To determine the proportion of total spending that is potentially preventable across distinct subpopulations of high-cost Medicare beneficiaries.
Design:
Beneficiaries in the highest 10% of total standardized individual spending were defined as "high-cost" patients, using a 20% sample of Medicare fee-for-service claims from 2012. The following 6 subpopulations were defined using a claims-based algorithm: nonelderly disabled, frail elderly, major complex chronic, minor complex chronic, simple chronic, and relatively healthy. Potentially preventable spending was calculated by summing costs for avoidable emergency department visits using the Billings algorithm plus inpatient and associated 30-day postacute costs for ambulatory care-sensitive conditions (ACSCs). The amount and proportion of potentially preventable spending were then compared across the high-cost subpopulations and by individual ACSCs.
Setting:
Medicare.
Participants:
6 112 450 Medicare beneficiaries.
Measurements:
Proportion of spending deemed potentially preventable.
Results:
In 2012, 4.8% of Medicare spending was potentially preventable, of which 73.8% was incurred by high-cost patients. Despite making up only 4% of the Medicare population, high-cost frail elderly persons accounted for 43.9% of total potentially preventable spending ($6593 per person). High-cost nonelderly disabled persons accounted for 14.8% of potentially preventable spending ($3421 per person) and the major complex chronic group for 11.2% ($3327 per person). Frail elderly persons accounted for most spending related to admissions for urinary tract infections, dehydration, heart failure, and bacterial pneumonia.
Limitation:
Potential misclassification in the identification of preventable spending and lack of detailed clinical data in administrative claims.
Conclusion:
Potentially preventable spending varied across Medicare subpopulations, with the majority concentrated among frail elderly persons.
Primary Funding Source:
The Commonwealth Fund.
Related Concept Videos
Preventive Healthcare Services
Methods of Documentation VI: Case Management Model
For example, a patient with a chronic...
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
Documentation in Long-Term and Home Healthcare Setting
Long-Term Care Facilities
Specialized Care Centers and Settings-II
Rural health centers are specialized care facilities in remote locations with very few medical personnel. The primary care providers who run the centers are mostly Registered Nurse Practitioners. Here, emergency treatment is provided to critically ill or injured patients before they are transferred to the closest hospital. Fortunately, due to advancement in technology, many rural healthcare facilities and professionals have easy access to diagnostic and treatment...
Issues And Trends In Healthcare Delivery System
Cost Containment
Payment for healthcare services has historically promoted adoption of costly and often unnecessary or inefficient...

